Needed: A Lesson in History
I am not a midnight's child or a child of partition. Actually, I was born the year after Nehru died. In a sense, I represent the post-Nehruvian generation, those for whom the freedom struggle was confined to Amar Chitra Katha comics and history textbooks that valorised our national icons. And yet, i must confesss there is something about 60 years of Indian independence that fills me with a sense of pride and nostalgia.
Pride in being an Indian, nostalgia for what it must have been like in those heady days ahead of August 15th 1947. Looking at sepia-tinted images of Rajpath on the day India achieved freedom, one can imagine the frenzied crowds, the sense of utter joy at being a free nation. We take freedom for granted today.
We couldn't have been quite so bindaas 60 years ago. That perhaps is our greatest achievement, creating a sense of uninhibited freedom among millions (spit where you want, vote for whom you wish!).
Few gave this country a chance of survival 60 years ago. The prevailing wisdom was that India would crack apart into dozens of princely states, that the centre would simply not hold. By contrast, it was expected that Pakistan would be a more homogenous nation,united by religion. As it has turned out, Pakistan is on the brink of disaster, a nation undermined from within by religious fanaticism and an emasculated middle class.
Sure, India too has its crisis points, it is an imperfect democracy, battling poverty, farmer suicides and unemployment, but despite the imperfections, its been astonishingly resilient.
In his remarkable book, India after Gandhi, historian Ramachandra Guha tries to unravel the enigma of India. Why does India survive he asks in his final chapter?
His answer, a sense of a shared symbols - cricket, cinema, music - a respect for diversity, and above all, a remarkable constitution that guarantees fundamental rights and enshrines the principle of one man one vote. I think this country owes a huge debt to the framers of the constitution. I cannot think of a more progressive document anywhere in the world, one that respected individual rights above all .
We must be blessed that in the 1940s a collection of rare public figures came together to frame the constitution. It might be difficult to imagine this in our polarised times, but in the 1940s, Indians had the sagacity to realise that people of differing ideological persuasions needed to be brought together so that every possible talent could be harnessed.
Ambedkar may have been no friend of Gandhi, but it was the Mahatma who insisted that he part of the constitution drafting committee. As the Mahatma put it, "Freedom has come to the Indian nation, not to the Congress party." (will some members of the Congress party learn from this?)
Maybe, we need to read our history books once again to understand the true meaning of freedom, of being an independent nation. Today's young and restless I fear (and I hope I dont sound ancient here) often have little knowledge or interest in history.
How many young Andhraites know of the sacrifice of Potti Sriramalu, the man whose fast unto death led to the formation of the modern Andhra Pradesh, and laid the basis for liguistic states. How many young Maharashtrians know of the samyukta Maharashtra movement and the sacrifice of those who fought for their state?
Is any young Punjabi interested in reading the biography of Tara Singh? The Forward Bloc may keep the flame of Netaji alive, but do young Bengalis bother to read his life story? Sadly, we are becoming a country ignorant of our history.
We seem more comfortable with the quick fix cinematic idea of Gandhi in Munnabhai (a film I enjoyed), then doing anything to really try and understand the man behind the Mahatma.
In the 60th year of Independence, we need to make a pledge: a pledge to try and appreciate our history a little more.
Remember that old chestnut: those who forget their history are condemned to repeat it.
Meanwhile, have a great Independence Day. (And while sending sms greetings to friends, maybe pause to think of all those great men and women who made this day possible.)




More about Rajdeep Sardesai
Rajdeep Sardesai is the Editor-in-Chief, IBN18 Network, that includes CNN-IBN, IBN 7 and IBN Lokmat. He comes with 22 years of journalistic experience during which he has covered some of the biggest stories in India and the world. Prior to setting up the IBN network, he was the Managing Editor of both NDTV 24X7 and NDTV India and was responsible for overseeing the news policy for both the channels. He has also worked with The Times of India for six years and was the city editor of its Mumbai edition at the age of 26. During the last 22 years, he has covered major national and international stories, specialising in national politics. He has won numerous other awards for journalistic excellence, including the prestigious Padma Shri for journalism in 2008, the International Broadcasters Award for coverage of the 2002 Gujarat riots and the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award for 2007. He has won the Asian Television Award for best talk show for the Big Fight on two occasions and his current flagship show on CNN-IBN, India at 9, has been awarded the best news show at the Asian awards for the last two years. He has been News Anchor of the year at the Indian Television Academy for seven of the last eight years and won more than 50 awards in this period. He has also been the President of the Editors Guild of India, the only television journalist to hold the post and was chosen a Global leader for tomorrow by the world economic forum in 2000. An alumni of St Xavier's College, Mumbai, he has done his Masters and LLB from Oxford University and has also played first class cricket for the Oxford University team. He has contributed to several books and writes a fortnightly column that appears in seven newspapers.



Recent Posts
- + Rushdie row takes one back to the politics of 1980s
- + The 'Anna' factor in 2012 polls
- + Media, a double-edged sword for Anna, Govt
- + 50 years of liberation: Is Goa losing its sheen?
- + Unparliamentary flip flops mar FDI debate
- + Dravid, the cricketer of substance
- + Formula 1, undercurrents many
- + Maya & Ambedkar: Incongruous? May be not
- + Pranab holds a poorly led UPA together
Archives
























displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them.
Comments
305