No checks please, I'm a Bollywood star
Ah, India and its ridiculous VIP syndrome again! Once again the syndrome of Don't-You-Know-Who-I-Am. Once again politicians are outraged that actor Shah Rukh Khan was questioned at Newark airport in the US. The UPA is in a state of high outrage. Shashi Tharoor says the incident is deeply offensive. Praful Patel says it's a matter to be taken up with the US government. Ambika Soni says there should be "tit-for-tat" frisking. Are you serious Mrs Soni? Is frisking a game for you? I-frisk-you, you-frisk me? Mrs Soni you are reducing vital security procedures to an eerie charade, to a nonsensical ritual. It is precisely because of such attitudes that we are so vulnerable to attacks and precisely why Indian security systems are a joke the world over.When rules are bent for hundreds of VIPs, what do terrorists have to fear?
Perhaps the wonderfully talented Shah Rukh Khan, beloved of millions, should limit his superb skills to doing what he does best: making great movies and enhancing the silver screen. His lectures on geo-politics, America's role in the world, security procedures and international diplomacy are a little bit hilarious. So you endured a bit of questioning at Newark because your baggage hadn't arrived on time, Shah Rukh? So what? As Meghnad Desai said on Face The Nation, what's the big deal? Be like APJ Abdul Kalam and just get on with it.
Hundreds of Muslims and Sikhs were rounded up and questioned post-9/11. All forms of abuse of human rights were recorded. Where were the high grandees of the UPA then? In India, the shocking truth is that Muslims find it difficult to get housing. Our security personnel routinely discriminate against anyone in a beard or lungi. Muslims face the most horrendous injustices in their daily life, and yet we are getting all holier-than-thou about racial and religious profiling in America? Racial profiling is an infringement of personal liberty, of course. But let's not pretend it does not exist right here in India under a different name.
Frankly I would much rather have open transparent checking and honest frisking, than layers of hypocritical prejudice, suspicion, and cloak-and-dagger communalism. Why don't Indian landlords openly check the backgrounds of their potential Muslim tenants, instead of wallowing in their own unquestioning secretive hatred and bigotry?
We Indians simply do not understand why important people should submit to rules and regulations. If you are "important" or a "celebrity" we expect to subvert queues and rules. In addition to Independence Day and Republic Day, we should have a Let's Stand in Queue Day. A day when every Indian - rich, poor, big, small, celebrity, common man - stands patiently in queue, awaits his turn and submits, if necessary to security procedures. Let's be honest and open about the need for checks in our society, not whip up self-righteous rage about protocol on the one hand, and propagate a secretive bigotry on the other.




More about Sagarika Ghose
Sagarika Ghose has been a journalist for 20 years, starting her career with The Times of India, then moving to become part of the start-up team of Outlook magazine, subsequently joining The Indian Express as Senior Editor. She was anchor of the flagship BBC World programme Question Time India before moving to CNN-IBN as prime time anchor and Deputy Editor. She is the anchor of the award-winning flagship debate programme Face The Nation on CNN-IBN. She is also a columnist for the Hindustan Times. She has won numerous awards including FICCI Media Achiever Award and Gr8-ITA Award for Excellence in Journalism. She is a graduate in History from St Stephen's College and was awarded a Rhodes Scholarship to Oxford University where she gained an MA and M.Phil in History and International Relations. She is the author of two acclaimed novels The Gin Drinkers and Blind Faith, both published worldwide by HarperCollins Publishers.



Recent Posts
Archives
























displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them.
Comments
112