Sagarika Ghose
Wednesday, November 11, 2009 at 00 : 54

Curtain call


21IBNLive IBNLive

Buddhadeb Bhattacharyya is a Shakespearan tragic hero

Defeat sometimes begins at the moment of victory.

In 2006, the ruling Left Front had thundered back to power in West Bengal, winning for the seventh consecutive time with a resounding three fourths majority.

Today, just three years later, the same invincible Left Front has just suffered yet another electoral disaster in last weekend's by-polls.

Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of communism, it looks as if it's the end of communism in West Bengal too.

Most piquant of all is perhaps the Shakespearean tragedy of Buddhadeb Bhattacharyya, who this week begins his tenth year as chief minister of West Bengal.

The man of destiny who suddenly finds himself consigned to redundancy. Once he was the nationally hailed "brand Buddha", Azeem Premji called him the best chief minister in India, he was a friend of Manmohan Singh, he was the playwright- communist whose destiny seemed to be to become the Deng Xiaoping of the Indian Left who would transform communism into a new mantra of progress and positive thinking.

The mandate of 2006 was a mandate for Buddhadeb, it was he who was single handedly responsible for large sections of the urban business vote and middle class vote that came to the Left.

But within a year of his victory, hit by the twin blows of the Singur agitation and the killings in Nandigram, Buddhadeb, the successful brand, became Buddhadeb the market failure.

Now with Maoists rampaging in Midnapore, even pulling off an audacious train hijack under the government's nose, the gigantic mandate of 2006 has become a distant memory.

Instead short term history is dominated by the almost shocking triumph of the Trinamool in the general elections this year, a victory that has thrown out the doughty satraps of the Left from seats they had held for decades.

Compared to the storm against the Left building in Bengal's rural areas, a storm Mamta Banerjee looks all set to harness to her cause, Buddhadeb Bhattacharyya's brave words of a twin pronged strategy of force and development to fight the Maoists, sound hopelessly futile.

Perhaps Buddhadeb became a victim of the same politics and society that the Left has created over its 32-year old rule in West Bengal.

It has created a society where institutions are brazenly politicized, where violence has been legitimised, where the Bengali (with honourable exceptions) has been reduced to a narrow-visioned envy-filled individual whose dominant mindset is reverence of dead heroes and contempt for all contemporary success.

The constantly sneering contemptuous Bengali is a far cry from noble spirited nation-building ancestors like Tagore and Ramomhan Roy, and is a result of the fact that the Left failed to encourage a true meritocracy in West Bengal and instead of generating talent, encouraged only an envy of talent.

No wonder the opportunity-seeking Bengali youth fled, thriving in institutions where their native intelligence was not seen as anti-Party.

Change is bound to be regarded with suspicion in a society that has fallen into stasis. A personal popularity cult like Buddha's was bound to breed jealousy and factionalism within a party unaccustomed to genuine charisma.

With all his advantages, Buddhadeb sadly failed to build the political support needed for reform, relying on his communist cadres who had become accustomed to imposing their writ by force. He failed to unite the party to the cause of reform or initiate a massive outreach programme between party and people that would have built new bridges between leaders and people.

Buddhadeb tried to create a development-friendly government but he failed to realise that it was his own government which was creating a development unfriendly society.

Two decades of an anti-English language policy had brought to a halt the fluency in a language Bengal once spoke better than any Indian state.

Talent had migrated out of Bengal. The lack of political competition had meant that there was no incentive to deliver governance and human development, unlike Kerala where a two party system as well as a welfarist ruling tradition has created an impetus to provide primary education and healthcare.

Today in West Bengal the so called "intellectual" state of India, the school drop out rate is 78.03 per cent, only Bihar Nagaland, Meghalaya and Sikkim fare worse.

The flooding of educational institutions by party faithful has meant that generations have been consigned to mediocre teachers. There has been no entrepreneurial movement in Bengal since the 1960s so no Narayan Murthys or Nandan Nilekanis exist to put Bengal on the information superhighway.

The destruction of Bengal's intellectual capital, the culture of negativism, the numbing inertia of its government machinery meant that West Bengal's society was simply not ready for Buddhadeb's new industrial policy and the radical changes that it entailed.

And sadly the chief minister lacked the political and administrative shrewdness to push his policies in a hostile environment.

A leading newspaper recently held a debate in Kolkata where the motion was 'The Resurgence of Bengal is an impossible dream'. Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee made an impassioned speech against the motion and won the audience vote.

Come 2011 when assembly polls are held again in Bengal she may well win the chief minister's chair too and Buddhadeb Bhattacharyya can go back to writing plays.

But a mere change in regime in West Bengal will mean nothing if one set of party faithful replace another set of party faithful and one violent cadre is replaced by another violent cadre. Bengal doesn't just need a new government, instead a brain-dead Bengal needs some severe shock treatment.

A decaying society needs to be kicked awake in every sector, in education, in administration and in business. Buddhadeb Bhattacharyya went far, but he could not go far enough and succumbed to the social forces his own party had created.

Mamata Banerjee has given no signs so far that she can administer the shock treatment needed. Caught between a dejected Buddha and an unfocussed Mamta, Bengal must await its messiah.


IBNLiveIBNLive
IBNLiveIBNLive
IBNLive IBNLive

Comments

21

  

All comments will be published after moderation.

IBN7IBN7

More about Sagarika Ghose

Sagarika Ghose has been a journalist for 20 years, starting her career with The Times of India, then moving to become part of the start-up team of Outlook magazine, subsequently joining The Indian Express as Senior Editor. She was anchor of the flagship BBC World programme Question Time India before moving to CNN-IBN as prime time anchor and Deputy Editor. She is the anchor of the award-winning flagship debate programme Face The Nation on CNN-IBN. She is also a columnist for the Hindustan Times. She has won numerous awards including FICCI Media Achiever Award and Gr8-ITA Award for Excellence in Journalism. She is a graduate in History from St Stephen's College and was awarded a Rhodes Scholarship to Oxford University where she gained an MA and M.Phil in History and International Relations. She is the author of two acclaimed novels The Gin Drinkers and Blind Faith, both published worldwide by HarperCollins Publishers.
IBN7IBN7

IBN7IBN7

Recent Posts

Archives

IBNLiveIBNLive