Total posts: 34
Display:

« Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 |

Tracked by 0 users Track this thread

Post your message
Ban on Gautam Gambhir: Is cricket losing its sporting spirit?

Ban on Gautam Gambhir: Is cricket losing its sporting spirit? | Read Story

TimePosted by IBNLive at 10:34 AM, Oct 31, 2008 | Updated at 01:07 PM, Oct 31, 2008 in Sports

Gautam Gambhir has been slapped a one-match ban by the match referee for his spat with Aussie all-rounder Shane Watson on Day 1 of the ongoing Kotla Test. Sparring at competitive field events is a worldwide phenomenon and all international sports have an element of histrionics attached to them. Cricket being a passionate game has also had its share. Isn't the ban too tough? Is the game losing its sporting spirit?

Ban on Gautam Gambhir: Is cricket losing its sporting spirit?
Yes
81 %
 
No
19 %
 
 

Posted by praveena_a at 05:16 PM, Oct 31, 2008

First of all i want to congratulate aussies. Their dirty tactics worked and now one of the indian batsmen who is in his supreme form is out for the next match. If we start penalising aussies for their spirit then i guess only 5-6 players will be available for next matches.Such a pity !!!


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by at 05:12 PM, Oct 31, 2008

UNDOUBTEDLY THE ANSWER IS A BIG "NO" - Dipak Mitra, Sikkim


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by kharester at 04:33 PM, Oct 31, 2008

1. Ban is too tough? I say no, he deserved a punishment, if not a sterner action. I feel he got away too lightly. This is not gully cricket. Every action on the field is recorded and broadcasted by zillions of news channels. Is this the sort of cricket we want to play? or is this the examples our national team want to set. The sport is bigger than the players ego's and personal grudges. Physical abuse, under whatever circumstances, shud not be tolerated.

2. Is the game losing its spirit. Yes, incidences like these are perfect example. Aggression is good, and required, but the players should be aware not to cross the line.


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by emmessen47 at 04:26 PM, Oct 31, 2008

No No No. Cricket has not lost its Charm nor the credentials of gentlemanly sens of the game. Only the watch dogs are not behaving as gentleman. In any controversy, the referee always award a severe punishment only to Asians and take soft corner to whites. The referees are never Gentlemen and always have a biased opinion. We Asians are not mighty enough to teach lessons to the referees in spite of all Financial muscles we possess. The decisions awarded by the so called referee are utter nonsense.

M.Suryanarayana


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by kenpinku at 02:20 PM, Oct 31, 2008

i believe that the ICC has the power to ban any player which violates any of the ICC code of conduct. in one of the laws , it is mentioned that physical contact of any manner is unlawful. Since Gambhir had committed this offence more than once, it is naturally obvious that action should be taken against him. i also believe that the Indian Management should start an Anger Management session with the Indian team.

The Aussies might be the instigators but the reciprocal effect was illegal. i believe that it is only in the indian Aussies series where we get to see alot of bad blood, in some way cricket is losing its sporting spirit but , this is only between indians and the aussies. the other countries play cricket with a better temperament.



Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by abhshk at 12:28 PM, Oct 31, 2008

Current Rating:

Yes,
The cricket has lost its sporting spirit.Because the only people who were following it (read Indians) have rebelled to raise voice against Aussies/England players.
God Bless Cricket
God Bless Aussie Cricketers
God Bless England Cricketers
God Bless Broad Family......


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by ramani_53 at 12:27 PM, Oct 31, 2008

Cricket or any international game no more a "sports and pastime" as it was decades ago. It is taken very seriously as a profession where lots of money can be made but a short time to do it. Consequently, the competition is cut throat. Of course, don't forget media coverage and subsequent fan following. As they say, "it no more a sport but a war out there". And everything is fair in war. Naturally, the first casualty is, what old timers would call, sportsman spirit.

Coming to Gambhir's incident, I thought he was lucky it was not taken as level 3 misconduct. I think he was stupid to do physical infringement. Our Indian players should have lessons on how to retort to povocations on the field. And there can be no better person to teach them than Gavaskar, who is smart on all these things.


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by pradeepchittoor at 12:22 PM, Oct 31, 2008

Most Unfortunate that cricket has been reduced from a gentlemans game to one of vagabonds.
If Watson had initiated this exchange, his punishment should be far more severe than that for Gautam.
It clearly smacks of nepotism, favouratism and Bias.
The same has occurred time and again, as was seen in Sydney, where the Aussies won only because the umpires played fraud.
The little Master, Gavaskar was absolutely right in his observation.
Time to set these biases to rest by ensuring honesty first and honesty last. which should be the single criteria for selecting umpires and judges.


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

  lessPosted by sbhattacharjee at 12:03 PM, Oct 31, 2008

Dear Sir
IT HAD LOST ALL ITS CREDITABILTY THE DAY WHEN THE NEWS HAD SPROUTED THAT MATCH FIXING WAS AND IS IN PROCESS

THANKS
REGARDS
SHYAMAL BHATTACHARJEE
bangalore-76


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by naveenbalaji.d at 12:26 PM, Oct 31, 2008

if gambir is baned for one match why didnt the same happen in zaheer-hayden hearing. it is clear that the western referees are taking Indian players the way they want. BCCI should interfere and make the referees realize their mistake this is not the first time things are happening against Indian players


Reply to this post | Rate this post | Track User | Click if Offensive

Posted by sbhattacharjee at 04:44 PM, Oct 31, 2008

dEAR nAVEEN bALAJI
I HAVE COMMENTED totally UPON WHETHER CRICKET HAS LOST ALL ITS SPIRIT IN TERMS OF SPORTS.

I HAVE NEVER MENTIONED EVEN A SINGLE WORD ABOUT gAMBHIR OR INDIAN PLAYERS.

It seems to me that you have miscalculated my opinion.

Thanks
Regards
Shyamal Bhattacharjee
Bangalore-76


Reply to this post | Rate this post | Track User | Click if Offensive

  lessPosted by vinayakapran at 11:52 AM, Oct 31, 2008

Current Rating:

Yes, cricket is losing its sporting spirit.

Here we see clearly different yard stick applied to Gambhir and Watson while sentencing.

The sentencing is like one is hit with a stick and another with a straw.

There should be some equality when sentencing, this shows clearly the motive of match referee to give harsh punishment to Gambhir and letting off Watson with just a fine.

Why always Indians should suffer? Law is equal to all but here one law for Australians and other for Indians.


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by lavnigam at 03:17 PM, Oct 31, 2008

I entirely agree with your statement that ultimately it is the game of cricket that is suffering dur to these onfield spats. But if you go a bit in the past, it was the Aussies who were regarded as very offensive on the field and the other nations like India, Pak or Sri Lanka would bear their tantrums. The reason was very simple..the Aussies were considered unbeatable and no complaint would have any effect on them. Then came the era when Sourav Ganguly's team showed to the Aussies that India had the capability to beat them - both in the game and on the onfield spats. This is where the ICC seems to take sides of the Aussies - for silmilar offence, an Aussie is given a mild punishment and Indian player a tougher sentence. The Aussies seem to realise this and have now made it a strategy to attack an inform Indian player and provoke him to such an extent that he reacts on the field. Then their backroom team at Australia takes over to ensure that the inform player is out for the next few tests, as he has been banned by the match refree. This happened with Harbhajan Singh when he was in complete form and a thorn for the Aussies, and has happened with Gambhir at Delhi.

It is true that the game of cricket has more than 11 players playing .. 11 on field and around same numbers off-field trying to strategise the ouster of in-form players.


Reply to this post | Rate this post | Track User | Click if Offensive

« Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 |

ibnlive.com on mobile: Join debate, leave voice messages on m.ibnlive.com

  • Active Users

srikantiah (4460 posts)

raomeister (4004 posts)

sbhattacharjee (3326 posts)

kkameswaraniyer (2911 posts)

sivaraman89 (2002 posts)

tpod (1814 posts)

shanthanu4640 (1671 posts)

jay1jay1jay1 (1666 posts)