Total posts: 186
Display:

« Previous | 10 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | Next »

Tracked by 0 users Track this thread

Post your message
Should the Mumbai sea link have been named after Rajiv Gandhi?

Should the Mumbai sea link have been named after Rajiv Gandhi? | Read Story

TimePosted by IBNLive at 07:01 PM, Jun 30, 2009 | Updated at 12:43 PM, Jul 01, 2009 in India

UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi on Tuesday inaugurated the gleaming new $325 million bridge, the Bandra-Worli Sea Link, which has been named after former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi. Sonia Gandhi is Rajiv's widow. The Congress, which recently slammed UP CM Mayawati's move of building her own statues, does not seem to be practising what it has been preaching. Should the Congress have named Mumbai's new architectural marvel after the former PM?

Posted by prof_bagga at 09:38 AM, Jul 01, 2009

This is where the nature of the congress party comes out. I pity Mr.Pawar who gives preference to attending ICC meetings rather than to people who are suffering without rains, for suggesting Rajiv's name. I am not against naming this against Rajiv Gandhi. They have already named so many land marks against him. There are so many people and many former prime ministers who sacrificed their lifes for this country. why are they not even being considered? And this congress party which slammed Mayawati for building statues, names each and every landmark in India against Rajiv and Indira. If they continue this, every street and every land mark in India will be named against the Nehru family. Naming the land marks against Rajiv will not do any good. If you have named it against some other person it would created a very good impression on the party.


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by neeradhingra at 09:36 AM, Jul 01, 2009

Current Rating:

I am amazed at the audacity of this govt to give everything in the country a Gandhi name. Hey there is more to India than a rajiv, sonia rahul etc etc. Till the time we all object to it the country will be enveloped with corruption & dynastic rulers. Its a shame indeed.


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

  lessPosted by michaelfernando at 09:34 AM, Jul 01, 2009

Current Rating:

Its fair enough to name the bridge after Rajiv Gandhi, who made good contribution to India's progress. Moreover, he was a secularist leader. The comment by opposition parties of naming it after Veer Savarkar(central icon of Hindu Nationalist Parties).

Congress has named it after its leader and the Hindu Nationalist Parties wanted it to be named after their leader.

Frankly, as a Mumbaite, I dont care who it is named after, as long as it decreases the time of journey and the traffic woes of the people of Mumbai. :)


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by lugayraho at 01:58 PM, Jul 01, 2009

That sounds like a religiously motivated opinion!
Why should a bridge be named after a politician?
Why can't it just be the Bandra-Worli Sealink?


Reply to this post | Rate this post | Track User | Click if Offensive

Posted by michaelfernando at 10:38 PM, Jul 02, 2009

Really? Please read the whole message. You will get my opinion.

My point is: How does it matter who it is named after?


Reply to this post | Rate this post | Track User | Click if Offensive

Posted by lugayraho at 03:59 AM, Jul 07, 2009

You accepted Rajiv Gandhi because you say he's secular. You don't like Veer Savarkar because he's Hindu. Is that not religiously motivated?

You don't sound as if you are motivated by India / Mumbai / the engineers, etc.


Reply to this post | Rate this post | Track User | Click if Offensive

Posted by johndoe1100 at 01:02 PM, Jul 01, 2009

Can you see beyond the religon front????


Reply to this post | Rate this post | Track User | Click if Offensive

Posted by prof_bagga at 12:11 PM, Jul 01, 2009

Mr.Fernando,

The point is that it's not just Rajiv Gandhi who has made contributions for Indian progress. There are many iconic figures whose names can be considered for this. Don't u think the ruling party which is naming all the landmarks against the nehru family should have considered other people also?


Reply to this post | Rate this post | Track User | Click if Offensive

Posted by nishudesh at 11:05 AM, Jul 01, 2009

Ya ! You Mumbaite's has already shown your good for nothingness by 41% vote turn around even after November attacks and went on holiday for extended weekend and most of them even don't know what Maharashtra Day is and why they got those holidays for. Was Savarkar only Hindu Nationalist? Wasn't he the one to glorify 1857 Mutiny by calling it the first war of Independence? Didn't Mahatma Gandhi wanted a 'Ram Rajya' after Independence? I don't think Rajiv did anything extraordinary to the country rather than reversing the protectionist policy of his grandfather and opening up the market after seeing the Chinese success story. Young people have more affinity towards technology and any young leader would have done that. Congress was in power for 50 years and they are the reason for corruption in India and promoting corrupt leaders and making politics look like a lucrative business.


Reply to this post | Rate this post | Track User | Click if Offensive

Posted by michaelfernando at 03:09 PM, Jul 07, 2009

I agree with you friend. Lots of mumbaikars didnt vote. But I wasnt one among them, I voted and even went to work on the same day. I know what Maharashtra Day is and frankly I dont feel I should be proving myself to you.

I agree Veer Savarkar had a major contribution. I have nothing against him. I was just analysing why the Hindu Nationalist parties were supporting him alone and then I found out he had those ideologies.

As far as politics goes, I dont think Congress alone is to be blamed for the corruption.

Again, the bottomline is: How does it matter who it is named after?


Reply to this post | Rate this post | Track User | Click if Offensive

Posted by shirole at 09:31 AM, Jul 01, 2009

The proposal by Sharad Pawar, was his way of falling at Sonia's feet. It is sheer psychophancy and opportunism. I believe the people of Mumbai will decide the name for the bridge. 'Bandra Worli Sea Link' is a nice name, I guess we should let it be.


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by mebuddu at 09:22 AM, Jul 01, 2009

It has been the order of the day that in each nook and corner of country roads, brides, airports, chowks, educational institutes, research institutes are being renamed after Nehru-Indira-Rajiv dynasty but they are very particular to keep the tag of Gandhi. I am sure on fine morning Mahatma Gandhi name and contribution will be wiped out by this die-hard sycophants. The days are not far when India will be renamed after Nehru-Indira-Rajiv-Rahul-etc and we all will be silent spectators. It is ironicl that JRD Tata never wanted the Indian Institute of Science Bangalore to named after him.


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by jvrenick at 08:35 AM, Jul 01, 2009

Naming a bridge which is useful for public is different from wasting 2000 crore in just statues which cause hinderance to the public.


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by ank_kir at 07:38 AM, Jul 01, 2009

Mayawathi is on Statue spree...
and from the past 6 years congress is on naming spree..
if you look at the projects in andhrapradesh.. every single thing is named after congress leaders. there is nothing wrong in naming by congress leaders. but these politicians should also consider the other great leaders who did a lot more to these areas.

if you see after 4 years, i think every nook and corner in india will be either indira/rajiv.

why the sea-link cant be called as Bandra-Worli link.?


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by alapatimadhu at 06:51 AM, Jul 01, 2009

Yes, it's a great honor being paid towards great Leader


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by vinshavinkul73 at 06:41 AM, Jul 01, 2009

India is fast tilting towards dynastic rule.Everyone is bringing forward their daughter even they are not qualified / capable for that.New entrants literally can not go up the ladder.India will not have president or PM just like Manmohan Singh or Barak Obama.It is just by luck that Manmohan Singh was made PM.


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

Posted by king_ask at 06:39 AM, Jul 01, 2009

I think it should be called just "Mumbai Sea Link (MSL)" representing true spirit of Mumbai and Mumbai residents (aka Mumbaikars).

I don't understand why each and every new bridge or a chowk or road or any other public facility be named after some politician/freedom fighter. Most of the cities/villages in India will have atleast one Gandhi chowk/putla or Nehru Raod.

Lets honor spirit of this great city and its residents by not naming it after any politician/freedom fighter's name. If people can't recognize such an engineering marvel name it after the city because there would be tens if not hundreds of bridges and chowks and roads named after Rajiv Gandhi/Mahatma Gandhi/Indira Gandhi/Pandit Nehru but there is one and only one MUMBAI on this planet earth.

Also lets not forget thousands of engineers and workers from HCC and other construction companies who made this possible. Lets show our appreciation to those planners and engineers who conceived this idea and made it possible. Is there a single bridge or road or airport or train station named after the chief planner or engineer???

lets not get in this name game.
Hats off to the spirit of Mumbai! let it be MSL!


Reply to this post Rate this post Track User Click if Offensive

« Previous | 10 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | Next »

ibnlive.com on mobile: Join debate, leave voice messages on m.ibnlive.com

  • Active Users

srikantiah (4460 posts)

raomeister (4004 posts)

sbhattacharjee (3326 posts)

kkameswaraniyer (2911 posts)

sivaraman89 (2002 posts)

tpod (1814 posts)

shanthanu4640 (1671 posts)

jay1jay1jay1 (1666 posts)