IBNLive.com: Breaking news from India

 

ROUND II: MAYA VERSUS SONIA

Font Size A+A-

Advantage Maya: Sonia's rally denied permission

TimePublished on Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 03:10, Updated on Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:06 in Nation » Politics section

MAYA-RIAD PROBLEMS: Sonia (L) has been denied permission to conduct rally in her own Lok Sabh constituency.

MAYA-RIAD PROBLEMS: Sonia (L) has been denied permission to conduct rally in her own Lok Sabh constituency.


Ads by Google

ibnlive.com is on mobile now. Read news, watch videos
be a Citizen Journalist. Log on to m.ibnlive.com NOW!

Photogallery

Find us on Facebook | Join IBNLive community

Stay ahead with G-Talk Buddy | Click now!

Ads by Google
  
Print
Email

New Delhi: It’s advantage Mayawati in the second round of clash with Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.

Sonia cancelled her plans to address a rally and perform Bhoomi Pujan for a rail coach factory in her Lok Sabha constituency Rae Bareli in Uttar Pradesh on Tuesday after Mayawati government clamped prohibitory orders in the area.

The orders were imposed under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code in Rae Bareli, which prevents the gathering of more than five people in the area.

The move comes after the Allahabad High Court virtually stayed the state government's decision cancelling the land allotment for a railway project in the area.

Additional District Magistrate DL Verma, in a statement, said the state government, "using its discretionary powers, has banned any kind of gathering, rally or public address" in Rae Bareli with immediate effect.

According to UPCC spokesperson Akhilesh Pratap Singh, the Congress chief would, however, visit Lalganj to inspect the Lifeline Express Train, a health camp on wheels run by the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation to look after the health needs of people in her constituency.

She would also visit some areas of her constituency and meet party workers. However, the proposed Bhoomi Poojan would not be held, Singh said.

The tussle

The Uttar Pradesh government had on Saturday night taken back the 400 acres it had allotted to the Indian Railways for a project.

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court on Monday ordered status quo on the land while hearing a writ of Northern Railway (NR) and a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) of villagers of Rae Bareli. The court has given a week's time to the state government to file a counter affidavit.

The Northern Railway (NR) moved the high court seeking a stay on the Uttar Pradesh government's decision to withdraw the land. Villagers and farmers of Lalganj also filed a PIL stating that the move of the state government would deprive the region of better development and job opportunities.

A division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Kant and Shabiul Hasnain, while ordering that status quo be maintained, listed the matter for further hearing Oct 22.

"The court has given a week's time to the state government to file a counter affidavit and 24 hours to the petitioners thereafter to file a rejoinder," Mohammad Arif Khan, the counsel of the petitioners, told reporters after the hearing.

Earlier, the court also summoned records related to the land and made a specific query regarding cancelling the allotment without giving proper opportunity to the petitioners.

Meanwhile, the state government, through its counsel, told the court that it will not take back possession of the land from the railway.

The railway, a few months ago, had acquired the land after paying compensation of Rs 8.5 crore, which the state government Sunday announced it would return.

"The government also stated that it will not initiate proceedings of allotting the land to anyone else or initiate any construction work on the same," Khan added.

Ads by Google
Related Ads:

About Us | Disclaimer | Careers @ IBN | RSS | Podcast | Contact Us | Feedback | Advertise With Us | Connect.in.com

© 2010 IBNLive.com India. All Rights Reserved. A Web18 Venture

CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them.