ibnlive » India » Delhi

Jan 02, 2013 at 10:55pm IST

Delhi gangrape case trial set to begin, chargesheet runs into 1000 pages

New Delhi: The Delhi Police is all set to submit its chargesheet in the brutal gangrape and murder case of the 23-year-old paramedical student in a moving bus in the national capital on Thursday. The police will submit the chargesheet in sealed cover, following which the court will hold an in-camera trial. The statement of the braveheart given to the SDM is slated to be one of the key evidence to nail the six accused in the barbaric case.

There will be a day-to-day hearing in the case at a fast-track court, inaugurated by Chief Justice of India at Saket on Wednesday. The prosecution has said that it will try to finish the trial in a month even as the Saket District Court Bar Association on Wednesday passed a resolution saying none of the lawyers would defend any of the accused in the brutal gangrape case.

ALSO SEE Delhi gangrape: Bus owner Dinesh Yadav arrested

While inaugurating the fast-track courts at Saket, the Chief Justice of India had sharp words for the police and a word of caution for protesters. He said, "If the Supreme Court directive to remove tinted glasses (from buses) was followed strictly, this may not have happened."

He further said, "Some people are demanding that we should hang them immediately. But we must balance things. Let us not get carried away. We must restore the faith of the people in the judiciary."

ALSO SEE Tharoor's remarks are his personal opinion: Cong

The Delhi Police has readied a 1000-page chargesheet and will be citing 30 witnesses in the case. In the chargesheet, the police have mentioned the entire sequence of events from the time the prime accused, Ram Singh, and five others had a party at their place and then took the bus out at night just to earn a few bucks to buy more alcohol. Apart from Ram Singh, while one of the accused is a minor, the others are Pawan Gupta, Vinay Sharma, Mukesh and Akshay Singh alias Thakur.

According to the chargesheet, the girl and her friend got into the bus at the Munirka bus stop, after which some of the accused made lewd comments and it led to an argument between the two groups. As the argument got heated, the girl and the boy were assaulted by the accused. While the boy was hit with a rod, the girl was gangraped.

ALSO SEE Name anti-rape law after my daughter: Braveheart's father

All the six accused in the case have been booked for dacoity, gangrape, murder and destruction of evidence. The police have decided to ask for the maximum punishment for the accused in the case. However, one of the accused is a minor and he will be produced before a juvenile justice board and can be sent to a children's home for a maximum of three years. The police, meanwhile, have decided to go for a bone marrow test of the sixth accused to determine his real age.

For evidence, the police will be using statements of the girl and her friend, girl's ATM cards and jewellery and the medical report which says the injuries were grievous enough to cause death. They also have the CCTV footage and forensic evidence picked up from the bus.

ALSO SEE Lawyers not to defend Delhi gangrape accused

The police have also arrested Dinesh Yadav, the owner of the bus in which the crime was committed, for violating rules to get permit. The police registered a case of cheating against him and picked him up from his residence in Rasoolpur Nawada village near Sector 62 in Noida.

Amidst this, another controversy concerning the braveheart has come up with Union Minister of State for Human Resources Development (HRD) Shashi Tharoor suggesting that the new anti-rape law be named after the Delhi braveheart if her family does not object. Reacting to it, the family of the braveheart also said that they had no issues in revealing the name of the 23-year old and said that it would be an honour if the law was named after her. However, the National Commission for Women and political parties, including the Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), did not speak in favour of the move. Sources in the Ministry of Home Affairs also pointed that there was no provision in the Indian Penal Code for naming a law after a person.

The braveheart had succumbed to her injuries at the Mount Elizabeth Hospital in Singapore at 2:15 am on December 29 after struggling against all odds and fighting for her survival for the past 12 days. The odds were stacked against her as she had suffered significant brain injury, intestinal damage, cardiac arrests and multiple organ failure. Her small intestine had to be removed by the doctors at Safdarjung Hospital where she was under treatment for 10 days before she was airlifted to Singapore for further treatment.

The body of the braveheart was laid to rest in the national capital amid heavy deployment of Delhi Police and RAF personnel after she was brought from Singapore in a special aircraft of Air India. Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit, Minister of State for Home Affairs RPN Singh, West Delhi MP Mahabal Mishra, Delhi BJP chief Vijender Gupta had also attended the last rites on Sunday. Media was not allowed at the site.

The case sparked nationwide protests as people from all walks of communities, including students, professionals and NGOs from across the country came out to show their solidarity to the braveheart and demand justice for her. The protesters also called for a stronger anti-rape law to ensure that such incidents did not happen in future.

Though the protests across the country have been peaceful, on December 23, the protests had turned violent, leading to a lathicharge by the Delhi Police. While several protesters were injured, a police constable, Subhash Tomar, was admitted at the Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital after the protests, where he died. The death of the constable sparked a controversy, with the post mortem report and the Delhi Police saying that his cardiac arrest was induced by serious injuries, and the eyewitnesses countering the claims saying the constable had suffered no injuries at all.