Font Size 
DU to check 'offending references' to Ramayana
Published on Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 17:40, Updated on Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 18:56 in India section
Tags: Ramayana, Delhi University , New Delhi
Related Stories
Gujarat dry status an ideological hangover? 
- India dry, Pawar says well-stocked for 13 months | Drought diary
- Manmohan, Gilani fix up meeting without a date
- India puts it in writing: Pak planned 26/11
- Burger King apologises to Hindus for offensive ad
- SC takes up plea against gay sex, issues notice
- Suspected Dawood aide acquitted in fake currency case
- Another 'lover' arrested at Sania Mirza's house
- Mumbai, Pune and Delhi face 30-40 pc water shortage
- Mysore: PFI activists clash with police, lathicharged
Photogallery
 |  |
New Delhi: The Supreme Court Friday asked Delhi University to set up an expert panel to examine if a chapter in a textbook for the history course should be removed for its "sacrilegious" references to Hindu god Hanuman and goddess Sita.
Acting on a plea pointing out the inclusion of the allegedly offending references, a bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, Justice P. Sathasivam and Justice J.M. Panchal asked university's vice chancellor Deepak Pental to examine the desirability of having such potentially offending texts in the course.
It issued the direction on a joint plea by a group of eight people, including educationists, former diplomats, teachers and journalists besides political and socio-religious leaders.
Appearing for the petitioners, senior counsel M.N. Krishnamani told the court about the inclusion of "sacrilegious material" for the graduation degree course in history.
He said the university teaches its second year History (Hons) students that "Lord Hanuman was a henchman of Lord Rama" and "the little monkey was a womaniser".
Krishnamani said that the compulsory course material describes Sita as "unfaithful to Rama" and as having been "seduced by Ravana and Laxman".
These references are from "Three Hundred Ramayanas: Five Examples and Three Thoughts on Translation", written by late critic A.K. Ramanujan, an essay that appears as a chapter of the book, "Many Ramayanas: The Diversity of Narrative Tradition in South Asia", edited by Paula Richman.
Krishnamani said the "offending" course material is being thrust upon the history students since 2005. He told the court that earlier his clients had moved the Delhi High Court seeking removal of the "offensive" course material.
On their plea, erstwhile Justice Manmohan Sarin of the high court had asked the vice chancellor to examine the desirability of having the controversial material in the History course, said Krishnamani.
But later after Justice Sarin's transfer to the Jammu and Kashmir High Court, another bench of the Delhi High Court dismissed the plea saying it cannot be heard by the court.
The petitioners have come to the apex court in appeal against the high court ruling.
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |
URBANEYE
Read Comment | Post Comment
This is the true face of "Secularism".
Any self-respected Hindu would feel bad reading all this. I
Read Comment
now.. if we say some thing against this.. we will be called Hindu terrorist!!!
this govt has taken the
Read Comment
Faults also lies with Muslims who support this type of anti Hindu propaganda. They must be very careful with these
Read Comment
Ban this book now, it hurts our religious sentiments and feelings. Wow even at University level, filth and derogatory text
Read Comment
Dear friends,
This is objectionable. Also if my Hindu feelings are hurt, I am also hurt of
Read Comment
Read more comment »