Fable or fact? Even ASI is perplexed over Ram Setu
Published on Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 02:27, Updated on Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:28 in India section
Tags: 30 Minutes, Ram Setu , New Delhi

![]() |


Related Stories
Education reform will be for all Indians: Sibal 
Federer wins record-breaking 15th Grand Slam title | Photogallery
Budget preview: Promises to keep | What to expect and what not 
One-upmanship: Sonia, Pawar in foodgrain politics 
5 feared dead in Madhya Pradesh factory explosions
Policemen guard Maya's statue wealth across UP 
Youth shot dead by cops had 26 injury marks | Watch 
CPI-M leaders to act to curb Kerala infighting
Recruiter of child suicide bombers held in Afghan
Paes-Black lose Wimbledon mixed doubles final
New Delhi: Is the Ram Setu a natural or a man-made creation? It’s now a question of faith versus science to resolve the Sethu Samudram dispute.
Fable or fact, even the Archaeological Survey of India doesn't really know. Sources within the ASI have confirmed to CNN-IBN that the ASI never conducted any study or investigation on the Ram Setu.
In fact, the Setu is not even recognised by the ASI as an ancient monument or a natural heritage site, and so, falls beyond its jurisdiction. Which means the controversial September 12th affidavit to the Supreme Court saying there was no historical proof of the Setu being man-made was submitted without conducting a study.
While the ASI bore the brunt of challenging faith and two of its officials awarded suspensions orders, sources in the ASI confirm that they would have conducted a study on the Ram Setu if they had been commissioned to do so.
But many at the ASI think the Setu should have been declared a natural heritage site long back.
“Conservation and preservation is today no longer limited to a single structure. It involves a whole setting of a historic site, historic landscape and in many cases these are very complex sites that have both the heritage and the nature associated with it,” says Ritesh Nanda conservationist.
But headed and run mainly by bureaucrats, key technical decisions are perhaps being delayed, or just being taken at the ASI.
The archaeologists working with the ASI believes that the body cannot function without the expertise of specialists. They believe that the affidavit blunder could have been avoided if experts had been in charge.
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |















Read Comment | Post Comment
There's no reason for any one to doubt about Ram-Setu fable
the facts are infront you,there is more proof for this
Read Comment
Nobody shoul be confuse or get perplexed,it's your own beli-
efs,according to christian book-when Joshua blew the trumpet
the walls of jericho-fell
Read Comment
When ever I visit an archelogical site, only thing I see is, a blue warning board installed by ASI (during
Read Comment
God RAM has created d SETHU in 17 lakh 50000 yrs ago which according to hindu calender is TRAITAYA yug.As
Read Comment
If no archeaological survey was conducted, then how come such an affidavit was filed ? Who was behind the affidavit
Read Comment
Read more comment »