IBNLive.com: Breaking news from India

 

PESTICIDES IN COLAS

Font Size A+A-

Govt can't digest CSE's cola report

TimePublished on Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 18:27, Updated on Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 15:08 in India section


Ads by Google

ibnlive.com is on mobile now. Read news, watch videos
be a Citizen Journalist. Log on to m.ibnlive.com NOW!

Photogallery

Find us on Facebook | Join IBNLive community

Stay ahead with G-Talk Buddy | Click now!

Ads by Google
  
Print
Email

New Delhi: In a report that could provide some relief to Pepsi and Coke, an official experts' committee on Tuesday punched holes in the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) report on pesticides in colas.

"Balanced approach (by CSE in reviewing the literatures on various aspects) has not been followed while undertaking the scientific review," the Committee headed by Dr D Kannungo, said in its findings that were made public by the Health Ministry.

I am not at all surprised. It is a clumsy attempt of the Government to give a clean chit to the cola companies...Let us be very curt, it is not the Government speaking, it was Coca-Cola speaking - Director of CSE, Sunita Narain

The committee was constituted by the government within days of CSE coming out with the report that claimed presence of very high level of pesticides in various brands of Pepsico and Coca-Cola.

"The (CSE) report does not provide details about the number of pertinent points, which are required for the confirmatory interpretation of quantum results," the Committee said.

Health Minister A Ramadoss constituted the committee on August 4 to examine "the methodology of sampling, methodology of testing and validity as well as the consistency of results derived by CSE in its report."

Looking into each of these aspects, the Expert Committee said that not only the sampling methodology lacked "scientific and statistically valid basis" but the "residue data reported based on GC-Mass confirmation is inconclusive."

Questioning the competence of the CSE lab facility in conducting such tests, the Committee said the "laboratory operates to the requirements of ISO 9001 does not demonstrates its competence to produce technically valid data and results."

"In the report, CSE has mentioned that it has set up the Pollution Monitoring Laboratory (PML) to monitor environmental pollution. PML is an ISO 9001:2000 certified laboratory, accredited by SWISO, Switzerland, doing pollution monitoring and conducting scientific studies on environmental samples," the Committee report said.

The Committee after deliberating the various findings in the 'Conclusions' (by CSE) did not find these "conclusions as correctly inferred, based on their study as made available", the report said.

The Committee also said, "The prevalence of different isomers of HCH are in contradiction to their biological nature. Further, no confirmatory evidence are supplemented to support the result."

Commenting on total ion Chromotogram (GC-MS) of various samples, the Committee said, "comparison of GC-MS of samples with the library hits has been done at 5 PPM (particle per million) whereas the confirmation of the containment has been

done at PPB (particle per billion) level.

"Most of the Characteristic fragmented ions are not recorded despite the fact the various pesticides contaminant have been claimed to be present in the market samples. Therefore, the residue data based on GC-MS confirmation is

inconclusive."

Citing contradictions in the report, it questioned presence of various chemicals and said while some of these were banned others were unlikely to be there in view of their chemical composition of the concentrates.

Ads by Google
Related Ads:

Copyright © IBNLive.com. All rights reserved. Reproduction of news articles, photos, videos or any other content in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of IBNLive.com is prohibited.

About Us | Disclaimer | Careers @ IBN | RSS | Podcast | Contact Us | Feedback | Advertise With Us | Connect.in.com

© 2010 IBNLive.com India. All Rights Reserved. A Web18 Venture

CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them.