While Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s statement to the Lok Sabha invited posterity and future generations to judge the value of the Indo-US deal on Civil-Nuclear Energy Cooperation, the timing and the tone of the statement reflected due concern for the judgement of the existing generation.
In this, he shares a dilemma that General Musharraf has faced in the last few years: how far is too far in cosying up to the US? Both Indian and Pakistani rulers have worried about public reaction to their ever-expanding engagements with the US.
The Indian Express-Dawn News-CNN-IBN-CSDS poll quizzed a sample of urban Indians and Pakistanis to get a sense of how they view the US and its role in the region.
The good news for the Prime Minister is that among the urban Indians the supporters of the Indo-US deal clearly outnumber the opponents.
Among the 2,000-plus respondents interviewed in the 20 Indian cities for this survey, there were 20 per cent informed supporters (who had heard about and supported the deal) as against only 10 per cent informed opponents.
Another 12 per cent offered indirect support, for they believe that the government is the best judge of matters to do with foreign policy which do not concern ordinary people.
The PM may have felt outnumbered in the Lok Sabha, but he can take some consolation that outside Parliament– at least in the big cities – the supporters of the deal outnumbered the opponents by three to one.
This is so not just among the supporters of the Congress but also among the BJP supporters. The less educated are no less supportive than the more educated, provided they know about this agreement.
On this evidence, a political campaign against the deal may not hold out much promise in a country where foreign policy issues do not drive political preferences.
But the Prime Minister would be well advised not to read too much into these figures, for these come with many riders:
- Nearly half the urban population had not even heard of an “Indo-US nuclear deal”. Predictably, the less educated were less informed. Greater awareness of the deal and more information about its contents could change the balance.
- These opinions could be very fickle. Indians do not hold very strong or stable views on matters of foreign policy and are largely guided in this respect by the party they happen to support. Thus what appears a favourable opinion could turn unfavourable if the overall political climate turns unfavourable.
- Those who are less favourably disposed towards the Indo-US deal include the Muslims, a community the ruling party is desperately trying to woo.
In any case it may be misleading to see this support for the Indo-US deal as a sign of a change in the Indian attitude to the US. For a long time, the Indian public perception of the US has been marked by distrust as well as envy.
Outside the parliament the supporters outnumber the opponents of the Indo -US nuclear deal | |
| All |
| Support the deal | 20 |
| Opposed to the deal | 10 |
| Government must be right | 12 |
| No opinion | 9 |
| Not heard | 49 |
| Note: All figures in column percentages for those who have heard of the Indo-US nuclear deal. ‘No opinion’ excluded from the analysis | |
“War against terror” finds few takers in the region | ||
| Urban India | Urban Pakistan |
| Led ‘War against terror’ is an excuse for global hegemony | 84 | 78 |
| Deserves credit for bringing democracy in Afghanistan | 46 | 26 |
| Is plundering Iraq under the garb of bringing democracy | 75 | 66 |
| Note: All figures in per cent of respondents who agreed with the statement in each row. The remaining disagreed. ‘Don’t know’ and ‘no opinion’ excluded from analysis | ||
No consensus on holding Al Qaida responsible for 9/11 … | ||
| Urban India | Urban Pakistan |
| Al Qaida is responsible for 9/11 | 41 | 5 |
| No evidence against Al Qaida | 22 | 40 |
| Not heard of 9/11 | 25 | 36 |
| Note: All figures in column percentages. Rest heard, but had ‘no opinion’. | ||
The last decade of various Indian governments inching towards the US has not made a dramatic difference to this attitude. Soviet Union may have disappeared but several surveys of public opinion have shown that Indian public still thinks of Russians as their friends. The public opinion in Pakistan too has swung against the US after 9/11.
The Indian Express-Dawn News-CNN-IBN-CSDS poll confirms that the opinion of the urbanites in both the countries – more informed and opinionated than the rest of the population – still reflect an anti-US mood.
There are few takers of the American line on ‘war against terror’ on either side of the Indo-Pak border. Urban Indians and Pakistanis are alike in believing that the US led ‘war on terror’ is nothing but an excuse for global muscle flexing and in attributing unholy motives to the US role in Afghanistan and Iraq. Even 9/11 fails to arouse much sympathy for the US. Most of the urban Indians and Pakistanis interviewed for this poll blamed the US foreign policy for the attack on twin-towers. While a majority of the urban Indians (much less in the case of Indian Muslims) who have heard about 9/11 hold Al-Qaida responsible for the attack, eight out of nine Pakistanis believe that there is no evidence to link Al-Qaida with 9/11.
Given this perception of American role in the world, it is not surprising that the role of the US in the region is not viewed very positively. The shifting policy of the US in this region has created a paradoxical situation: the Pakistanis are convinced that the US favours India and is no longer their friend, but Indians are yet to be convinced that the US is closer to India than to Pakistan.
A majority of Indian respondents and an overwhelming majority of the Pakistani respondents disagree with the proposition that the US is a trusted friend of their country. The urban Indians and well as the urban Pakistanis converge on the belief that the US is neither a friend of India nor that of Pakistan.
What, then, accounts for the approval, even if a mild one, of the Indo-Pak nuclear deal? Clearly, while the distrust and hostility towards the US has not disappeared, there is a new willingness to engage. This willingness is driven by a realisation of the growing presence of the only super power. About half the urban Indians feel that our government acts in accordance with the wishes of the US.
This contributes to a pragmatic desire, expressed by two-thirds of the urban Indians, to be friends with the super power. Yet the example from across the border shows that ‘realism’ can cut both ways. Three-fourth of the Pakistanis interviewed said their government acted in accordance with the US policy. Yet in Pakistan this realisation appears to have invited a backlash: nearly two-thirds of the urban Pakistanis did not think it was in their interest to be friends with the US.
That, then, seems to be the lesson for Dr Manmohan Singh as he awaits the posterity to judge the latest deal with the US: a carefully crafted and calibrated engagement with the super power can get pragmatic support from the population that tends to trust its rulers in matters external, but any haste on this path can land the government in the situation that General Musharraf finds himself in.
… instead, US foreign policy blamed for 9/11 | ||
| What led to 9/11 ? | Urban India | Urban Pakistan |
| US was a helpless victim of terrorism | 23 | 14 |
| Attacks were a result of US foreign policy | 77 | 86 |
| Note: All figures in column percentages. Rest heard, but had ‘no opinion’. | ||
Neither Indians nor Pakistanis believe the US is their friend | ||
| Who does US favour in the region? | Urban India | Urban Pakistan |
| US more friendly with India | 19 | 38 |
| US more friendly with Pakistan | 15 | 9 |
| Equally friendly with both | 13 | 9 |
| Not a friend of either | 53 | 44 |
| Note: ‘No opinion’ excluded from the analysis | ||
Pragmatism rather than trust that drives the support for friendship with US | ||
Those who agree with the statement that… | Urban India | Urban Pakistan |
| US is our trusted and close friend | 46 | 26 |
| My government acts on behest of US | 47 | 75 |
| Our interest is in being friends with US | 64 | 37 |
| Note:All figures in per cent of respondents who agreed with the statement in each row. The remaining disagreed. ‘Don’t know’ and ‘no opinion’ excluded from analysis. | ||
(For updates you can share with your friends, follow IBNLive on Facebook, Twitter and Google+)







Click to play video





















































displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them.