New Delhi: The economic reforms since 1991 are supposed to have invited one of the most intense and passionate debates in the country. The reality is embarrassing.
Only three per cent Indians have a fair idea of what the economic reforms are all about, says the Hindustan Times-CNN-IBN State of the Nation Survey conducted by the Centre of Study of Developing Studies.
The survey, in the second week of January, interviewed 7,681 ordinary people spread across 970 villages in 19 states of the country. Respondents were quizzed in the simplest language about some of the big questions raised in this debate.
Ignorant but not clueless
As many as 28 per cent people claimed they had heard about the new economic policies. But most of them did not have even a rough idea of the broad directions of the policy changes: deregulation, disinvestment, free trade, foreign investment and ‘liberal’ labour laws. Even among the most highly educated and media exposed, this figure was only 14 per cent.
Instead of asking people about actual economic policies, the survey gave them two fairly worded policy options and asked the people to choose one. The findings bring little cheer to the gung-ho supporters of economic reform:
- The Indian public is, on balance, clearly opposed to disinvestment of public sector undertakings, downsizing of the government and entry of foreign companies. Those who are well informed about these policies are even more opposed to these than the less informed.
- There is little demand for reduction in direct taxes. If the Finance Minister wanted to increase the tax on the rich, he would have solid public backing from all quarters except, of course, the urban rich.
- There is an overwhelming agreement that public services like electricity, water, road transport, hospitals and schools should be run by the government and not by private companies.
- If running these public services well requires increasing the fee or tariff, the people, including the poor, are prepared to shell out more money.
- The public believes that the economic policies of the last 15 years have benefited only the rich; only about the quarter of the respondents, more rich than the rest, believe that the reforms have benefited the poor as well.
Next Page: Surprising Statistics
To put it simply: if anyone cared to put policies of economic reforms on the political agenda and ask the public for its opinion, there is every chance that these policies may be voted out.
But from this it shouldn’t be concluded that the condition of ordinary people has actually deteriorated in this period. When quizzed directly about that, very few people, even among the rural poor, say that the economic conditions of their family have worsened in this period of economic reforms.
Optimist about future
Most of the people reported an improvement or stability in their economic conditions. Add to this their overall sense of satisfaction with their economic conditions, positive view of the country’s economy and their optimism about the future. And again remember the figure of 3 per cent who know about these policies. Now you perhaps know why a policy that does not enjoy public approval can be implemented in a democracy. At least for now.
Aware about Economic Reforms | |
Those who are--- | Results (%) |
| Well informed | 3 |
| Somewhat informed | 14 |
| Misinformed | 11 |
| Unaware | 72 |
Only educated and media savvy have a sense of economic reform | ||
Education | Media Exposure | |
Low | Hight | |
| Non-literate | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Up to primary | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Up to matric | 2.6 | 4.9 |
| Matric plus | 8.4 | 7.6 |
| Graduate | 11.1 | 13.0 |
| Post-graduate | 10.9 | 14.1 |
Oposition to the downsizing of the Government | ||
Support | Oppose | |
| All | 28 | 48 |
| Aware of economic reform | 28 | 67 |
Opposition to Disinvestments of Government Companies | ||
Support | Oppose | |
| All | 23 | 48 |
| Aware of disinvestment | 30 | 61 |
Support for higher tax on the rich | ||
Support | Oppose | |
| All | 49 | 28 |
| Urban Rich | 41 | 47 |
| Rural rich | 50 | 32 |
| Urban middle | 50 | 34 |
| Rural middle | 52 | 30 |
| Urban poor | 49 | 25 |
| Rural Poor | 47 | 23 |
Opposition to foreign companies | ||
Support | Oppose | |
| All | 29 | 39 |
| Aware of increased foreign investment | 37 | 45 |
Rest Opinion Support: Govt. should allow, foreign companies to come into our country since they bring more capital and technology.. Oppose: Govt. should not allow foreign companies to come in our country because they exploit us and take profits away | ||
Government must run key public services | ||
| Who should provide? | Government | Private Company |
| Electricity | 69 | 14 |
| Water supply | 71 | 14 |
| Hospitals | 67 | 14 |
| Schools | 67 | 13 |
| Bus service | 62 | 14 |
| Rest said Both or No Opinion | ||
People are willing to pay more for better public services | |||
Regular Electricity supply | Proper treatment in Govt. hospitals | Better education in govt. schools | |
| All | 63 | 72 | 69 |
| Urban Rich | 74 | 91 | 88 |
| Rural Rich | 74 | 81 | 81 |
| Urban Middle | 69 | 80 | 78 |
| Rural Middle | 68 | 77 | 75 |
| Urban Poor | 56 | 67 | 61 |
| Rural Poor | 54 | 63 | 60 |
| Rest is No Opinion | |||
Everyone agrees that reforms have benefited only the rich | |||
Rich | Both Rich & Poor | None | |
| All | 62 | 26 | 12 |
| Rich | 50 | 35 | 15 |
| Middle | 57 | 30 | 12 |
| Poor | 68 | 20 | 12 |
Everyone agrees that reforms have benefited only the rich | |||
Rich | Both Rich & Poor | None | |
| All | 62 | 26 | 12 |
| Rich | 50 | 35 | 15 |
| Middle | 57 | 30 | 12 |
| Poor | 68 | 20 | 12 |
Nearly everyone reports an improvement in the quality of living in the last 10 years | |||
Quality of food | Quality of clothing | Medical facilities in times of illness | |
| All | 56 | 55 | 53 |
| Urban Rich | 71 | 74 | 73 |
| Rural Rich | 70 | 70 | 69 |
| Urban Middle | 65 | 65 | 74 |
| Rural Middle | 63 | 63 | 60 |
| Urban Poor | 53 | 52 | 50 |
| Rural Poor | 45 | 43 | 41 |
| Rest mentioned either these have deteriorated or that there has been no change. | |||
Family’s economic condition has improved during last 10 years | |||
Improved | Deteriorated | Same | |
| All | 46 | 12 | 42 |
| Urban Rich | 70 | 6 | 24 |
| Rural Rich | 66 | 6 | 28 |
| Urban Middle | 57 | 8 | 35 |
| Rural Middle | 53 | 8 | 39 |
| Urban Poor | 33 | 18 | 49 |
| Rural Poor | 33 | 16 | 52 |
Economy also seen to have improved over last 10 years | |||
Improved | Deteriorated | Same | |
| All | 56 | 6 | 21 |
| Rest no opinion | |||
Overall satisfaction with family’s present economic condition | ||
Satisfied | Dissatisfied | |
| All | 71 | 23 |
| Urban Rich | 80 | 15 |
| Rural Rich | 77 | 16 |
| Urban Middle | 72 | 23 |
| Rural Middle | 74 | 18 |
| Urban Poor | 60 | 31 |
| Rural Poor | 56 | 32 |
| Rest is No Opinion | ||
Optimism about family’s future economic condition | |||
Improve | Deteriorate | Remain Same | |
| All | 58 | 8 | 23 |
| Urban Rich | 71 | 8 | 14 |
| Rural Rich | 70 | 5 | 15 |
| Urban Poor | 46 | 13 | 26 |
| Rural Poor | 50 | 9 | 29 |
| Rest is No Opinion | |||
(For updates you can share with your friends, follow IBNLive on Facebook, Twitter and Google+)







Click to play video





















































displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them.