IBNLive.com: Breaking news from India

 

Font Size A+A-

Netas no 'national assets' to be protected: High Court

TimePublished on Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 18:00, Updated on Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 18:16 in India section

EXTREME SECURITY: Delhi High Court slams politicians for flaunting their security.

EXTREME SECURITY: Delhi High Court slams politicians for flaunting their security.


Ads by Google

ibnlive.com is on mobile now. Read news, watch videos
be a Citizen Journalist. Log on to m.ibnlive.com NOW!

Photogallery

Find us on Facebook | Join IBNLive community

Stay ahead with G-Talk Buddy | Click now!

Ads by Google
  
Print
Email

New Delhi: This is one observation that has the potential to snowball into a major controversy. On Thursday, the Delhi High Court observed that politicians were not a "national asset" that should be protected.

The court took the politicians head on for having their security

guards on tow whenever they stepped out, inconveniencing the common citizens.

It wryly added, they should remain in the confines of their homes and offices if they feel threatened by citizens.

"You should not let these men (politicians ) to come out. Their presence in public places itself threatens the common men," the court observed.

"I do not know why it has become a matter of prestige for them to move with 10-15 uniform security personnel carrying lethal weapon," a bench comprising Justice T S Thakur and Justice Veena Birbal said while hearing a public interest litigation.

The court said politicians were not a "national asset" and if they were, the citizens would protect them.

“It (having security) has become fashionable and a status symbol. The more people (security men) surrounds these people (politicians) the more prestigious they feel. It is obnoxious that common men are forced to stay on the sidelines and are prevented to walk on the pavements when the politicians pass through," the court added.

The court was expressing its displeasure at politicians causing inconvenience to the public by the overwhelming presence of security guards.

The Court's observation came while hearing a PIL on police reforms seeking separation of force into two wings to deal with law and order and investigation independently.

In sharp remarks laced with sarcasm, the judges could not hide their dismay when they said, "If these people feel so threatened they should not come out in public places."

Ads by Google
Related Ads:

About Us | Disclaimer | Careers @ IBN | RSS | Podcast | Contact Us | Feedback | Advertise With Us | Connect.in.com

© 2010 IBNLive.com India. All Rights Reserved. A Web18 Venture

CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them.