FILM REVIEW
Masand's verdict: Australia is a test of patience 
Published on Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 22:28, Updated on Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 18:34 in Entertainment section
Tags: Masand's Verdict, Australia , Cast

![]() |


Related Stories
Politicians play coy; avoid debate on gay sex 
Serena wins Wimbledon women's singles title | Match in pics
Speeding bus falls on Howrah rail tracks, 10 dead 
Heavy rains throw Mumbai out of gear 
6 sharpshooters of Chhota Shakeel held in Delhi: cops
New swine flu case takes India's tally to 129
Goodbye to Mumbai slums, child star moves into flat
Cops accused of killing man to win medals | Watch 
Maid insists Shiney raped her: women's panel chief
Exhume bodies of Shopian women in Kashmir: High Court
Cast: Nicole Kidman, Hugh Jackman
Director: Baz Luhrmann
Baz Luhrmann, director of Moulin Rouge is no stranger to spectacle, but his latest offering Australia is a failed attempt at pulling off a David Lean-style sprawling epic.
The film's a heady mix of many genres including romance, adventure and war, but rather than being old-fashioned and classic, it's old-school and melodramatic.
The film set in 1939 Australia stars Nicole Kidman as Lady Sarah Ashley, a plucky Brit widow trying to save her ranch from an evil cattle baron.
Her allies include a half-caste boy she befriends who's being victimized by the government's racial policies against Aborigines, and the handsome cowboy (played by Hugh Jackman) who drives her bulls to market.
To be honest, after sitting through some two hours of campfires, cattle drives and mad stampedes, the film looks like it's finally ending, but just then you realise to your absolute horror that the last act is still ahead -- a good forty minutes or so dedicated to the World War II subplot.
Breathtakingly photographed, but sloppy from trying to pack in too much, Australia is a test of patience for any true-blue movie buff who will more than likely be on his knees praying for the film to finally end.
The romance between Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman's characters is schmaltzy and ridden with clichés, and the film's portrayal of Aborigines as uniformly kind and mystical beings seems counter-productive to its message against racial prejudice.
If Australia fails, it's not for lack of trying, but perhaps for trying too hard. I'm going with two out of five and at best an average rating for Baz Luhrmann's ambitious but flawed Australia, a film that feels longer than an actual flight to Down Under.
Rating: 2 / 5 (Average)
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |















Read Comment | Post Comment
Its amazing how such talented people with so much money make such dumb films. I really had no clue whether
Read Comment
This surely is a long never ending story. So many times I felt that its over now...but it just seemed
Read Comment
This is one of those reviews where I completely agree with Masand. It seems to be a never ending movie.
Read Comment
don't agree with the 2/5...i believe the basic objective of the movie from a Baz luhrman's point of view was
Read Comment
don't agree with the 2/5...i believe the basic objective of the movie from a Baz luhrman's point of view was
Read Comment
Read more comment »