Masand's Verdict: Fashion is all masala, no reality
Published on Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 22:33, Updated on Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 08:58 in Entertainment section
Tags: Fashion, Priyanka Chopra , Cast

![]() |


FM TUNES BUDGET FOR TAXPAYER, MKTS FACE THE MUSIC
Udayan's View: Budget 2009, a game of patience
A study in comparison: Education budget up Rs 7K cr
Reform hopes dashed, market watchers feel let down
I-T exemption limit raised | FBT rolled back | Taxes and you
Pranab skips two paras of Budget speech, apologises
Bengal benefits, Mamata and Pranab budget for their state
Common man gets a treat, over 15 schemes | For women
Income tax limits raised; farmers, exporters get sops
Health budget up by Rs 4,000 cr, 6 new AIIMS in cities
Cast: Priyanka Chopra, Kangana Ranaut, Mughda Ghodse, Kitu Gidwani, Raj Babbar
Direction: Madhur Bhandarkar
One of the inconsistencies in Madhur Bhandarkar’s Fashion comes through his portrait of aspiring model Meghna Mathur’s father, played by Raj Babbar. This Chandigarh dad is disapproving and unrelenting when his daughter, played by Priyanka Chopra, wants to head to Mumbai to become a model after winning a small-time beauty contest.
But when she comes back years later, an empty shell of a former supermodel in need of psychiatric visits, this dad pushes her back onto the ramp just because it is her dream. Correct me if I’m wrong, but only your worst enemy would coax you to go back into the world that left you scarred for life, certainly not your own father.
Of course, in a Madhur Bhandarkar film, logic plays little role as long as his reality formula kicks in. A woman protagonist will struggle and be exposed to the seamy side of things in her climb to the top, then lose it all to the trappings of success, hitting the gutter.
To Bhandarkar, this is the reality of the ramp – a bleak look at an industry rampant with drugs, homosexuality, power play, promiscuity.
Yes, it has flashes of authenticity, but what is Fashion trying to say? That every woman who becomes the showstopper or supermodel turns into a diva and gets mixed up with the worst kind of men? Or that they then spiral in a vortex of drugs, drink and one-night stands?
This seems to be the same formula in most of Bhandarkar’s films – from Page 3 to Corporate. It’s just the background that changes. So even though the director takes nearly three endless hours to tell Meghna Mathur’s story, you as the audience can see it coming a mile away.
Having said that, the glamour, the backstage choreography and the front-row reactions give the film its intriguing moments.
[ Single Page View ]
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |















Read Comment | Post Comment
Perfectly true Rajeev. Bhandarkar does not experiment, but sticks to the norm of his brand of cinema. Fashion though predictable,
Read Comment
Of course Rajeev you are right !!!
Many of my foggy friends didnt like this movie
Read Comment
Mr. Masand
You are bang on target regarding this film.
I like your reviews and most of
Read Comment
rajeeeeeeeeeeev! 3 on 5?? your generosity kills me. what about patchy editing, inane background action, terrible dubbing work on the
Read Comment
The movie is too long, very predictable and simply boring at most of the places. The last 45 minutes was
Read Comment
Read more comment »