Multi-crore fund scam exposes corruption in judiciary
Published on Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 21:07, Updated on Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:28 in India section
Tags: Judiciary, Ghaziabad Pf Scam , New Delhi


Related Stories
Gujarat dry status an ideological hangover? 
India dry, Pawar says well-stocked for 13 months | Drought diary
Manmohan, Gilani fix up meeting without a date
India puts it in writing: Pak planned 26/11
Burger King apologises to Hindus for offensive ad
SC takes up plea against gay sex, issues notice 
Suspected Dawood aide acquitted in fake currency case
Another 'lover' arrested at Sania Mirza's house
Mumbai, Pune and Delhi face 30-40 pc water shortage 
Politicos get into the ABC of Varun's Z-plus security 
New Delhi: A judge hearing the multi-crore Ghaziabad PF scam, allegedly involving High Court and Supreme Court judges, on Thursday withdrew from the case.
Justice B N Agarwal refused to hear the case after a bitter argument between senior counsel Shanti Bhushan and him.
Things went out of control following a comment by Bhushan that Supreme Court is giving protection to corrupt judicial officers.
This drew an emotional response from justice Agarwal, who said, “Senior counsels are abusing the judges. This is most unfortunate. You are behaving in the most unbecoming manner.”
But Shanti Bhushan says he was misunderstood. One Supreme Court and 11 High Court judges have been named in the Ghaziabad PF scam.
The allegations against them are that they have received gifts purchased from this ill-gotten money.
The Ghaziabad PF scam has thrown up many prickly questions about judges integrity and accounatabilty but the way the matter are being heard here in the Supreme court isn’t helping the cause either.
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |















Read Comment | Post Comment
When Indias premier lawyer Ram Jethmalani said that 1 in 7 judges are corrupt then, such a thing shouldn't make
Read Comment
I think the Judges have to be accountable as well. They comment on everybody for not doing their work efficiently,
Read Comment
Read more comment »