FACE THE NATION
Racist and blind to it: Indians face the mirror
Published on Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 08:04, Updated on Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 12:36 in India section
Tags: Face The Nation, Harbhajan Singh

![]() |


FM tunes Budget for taxpayers, mkts face the music
Udayan's View: Budget 2009, a game of patience
A study in comparison: Education budget up Rs 7K cr
Reform hopes dashed, market watchers feel let down
I-T exemption limit raised | FBT rolled back | Taxes and you
Pranab skips two paras of Budget speech, apologises
Bengal benefits, Mamata and Pranab budget for their state
Common man gets a treat, over 15 schemes | For women
Income tax limits raised; farmers, exporters get sops
Health budget up by Rs 4,000 cr, 6 new AIIMS in cities
Millions of cricket fans across India are enraged that off-spinner Harbhajan Singh has been accused of racism and banned for three Tests. Fans say there is no evidence against Harbhajan and no Indian can ever be racist.
“India’s national commitment is against racism. Our national struggle is based on values that negate racism,” the Indian cricket board has said while rejecting the allegation against Harbhajan.
But is that always true? Does a radio jockey calling Nepalese chowkidars and spectators teasing Australian all-rounder Andrew Symonds with monkey chants prove that we are racist or is it just the misbehavior of a few Indians? Are Indians unaware of their internal racist bias?
CNN-IBN’s Senior Editor Sagarika Ghose asked this on Face The Nation to Dipankar Gupta, who teaches Sociology at the Jawaharlal Nehru University, Professor Kancha Ilaiah, a Dalit activist and writer, and former cricketer Maninder Singh.
Cultural clash
Australians say ‘b*****d’ is not that offensive to them as ‘monkey’, the slur Harbhajan allegedly used against Symonds.
Indians would regard ‘b*****d’ very insulting but ‘monkey’ not that offensive. So is this controversy merely a play of words or is it a misunderstanding between two cultures?
“A word doesn’t become racist because two people suddenly decided it to be. A word becomes racist because of convention and a large number of people agreed that it was racist. The term ‘Paki’ is racist but Brit is not, the term Caucasian is not racist but the term ‘Negro’ is. Monkey is not a racist term in India,” said Gupta.
However, in the racism allegation against Harbhajan, Ilaiah reminded, “It is important to consider how Andrew Symonds perceived that word.”
“Symonds is a Black and ethnically he has been denied historical rights. He has alleged that he has been called a monkey because he is a Black person. That is very important,” he said.
“In India, Brahminical forces consider ‘Chandala’ as a positive word but Dalits, tribals and other backward classes consider it as completely abusive. Our casteism is transcending into racism,” said Ilaiah.
But is sledging on the cricket field really racism?
[ Single Page View ]
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |















Read Comment | Post Comment
Indians are racists there is no denying it. NNorth Indians are biased angainst the South Indians and vice-versa. I know
Read Comment
It's really funny to read comments of esteemed Prof. Illaiah egarding Hindus worshipping cow because it is white and not
Read Comment
"Every single human being is a racist, a hypocrite and a bigot per se. We just try to hide it
Read Comment
I had wathched the debate ydy. It was amazing the way the anchor went on ranting how Harbhajan should apologise.
Read Comment
Hi ,
This is to CNN-IBN "Face the Nation" folks.
Yesterday i was keenly watching the show and what i observe
Read Comment
Read more comment »