Review: Michael Clayton no Oscar material 
Published on Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 00:11, Updated on Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 21:45 in Entertainment section
Tags: Masand's Verdict, Michael Clayton , Cast
![]() |


Related Stories
Pranab has promises to keep in Budget of hope 
Budget and you: How policies impact your life | Secrecy Cordon around the Budget
30 feared dead in explosion at firework factory in MP
Youth shot dead by cops had 26 injury marks 
Varun fears threat to life; Maneka slams Govt
CNN-IBN debate: Homosexuality vs Indian morality 
CPI-M Central Committee to act to curb Kerala infights
Kargil victory was certain: ex-army chief | Pay Tribute 
British Islamic group plans coup in Pakistan: report
Scrap EVMs, let's go back to ballot, says Advani 
Cast: George Clooney and Tom Wilkinson
Director: Tony Gilroy
Sure we want intelligent films, and sure we're tired of those stupid, blockbuster action films where cars are blown up and suspicious aliens threaten to take over the world.
But Michael Clayton, nominated for seven Academy Awards this year, isn't my idea of a remarkable film. It's too long, too laborious and - let me stick my neck out really far now - it doesn't deserve to win Best Picture.
George Clooney plays the title character, a "fixer" at a high-power law firm who can make everyone's problems disappear - except of course his own. His life's a mess - he's broke, he's divorced and he's clearly burnt out.
Yet, it's him they come to when a star attorney at the firm - played by Tom Wilkinson - suffers what seems like a breakdown while defending a mega corporation from a high-profile lawsuit. It's upto Clooney to knock him back into line, but what happens next is what I suppose you could describe as the conflict in this film.
Michael Clayton is a film about greed, about responsibilities and about one's own conscience. It's an honourable film if you have the patience for it, it makes some interesting points if you care to listen.
But it goes about its business in a long-drawn-out, boring fashion that in the end it fails to connect. A film like Michael Clayton probably deserves a second viewing in order to fully appreciate its intention, but I'm sorry to say I don't have either the time or the energy or the desire to watch it all over again.
Because it's slow and takes its own sweet time to make its point, 'm going with two out of five and an average rating for director Tony Gilroy's Michael Clayton, it's fine, just fine, but feel free to decide for yourself.
Rating: 2 / 5 (Average)
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |
















Read Comment | Post Comment
r u nuts.. 2..? it deserves at least 3 - 4
Read Comment
Hi Rajeev,
I've agreed with your movie reviews most of the time. BUT not with your 2-star rating for 'Michael
Read Comment
definitely deserves a 4 atleast.....
Read Comment
i agree that it dosent deserve to win the best picture,but it is definetly a good film.rating it to 2
Read Comment
Agreed it's not Oscar material, but two stars? It's definitely more entertaining than Mithya and Jodha Akbar. 'No counrty for
Read Comment
Read more comment »