IBNLive.com: Breaking news from India

 

Font Size A+A-

SC notice to Centre on OBC quota

TimePublished on Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 13:15, Updated on Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:17 in India section

TELL US WHY : The UPA Government says the quota is needed for social equality.

TELL US WHY : The UPA Government says the quota is needed for social equality.


Ads by Google

ibnlive.com is on mobile now. Read news, watch videos
be a Citizen Journalist. Log on to m.ibnlive.com NOW!

Photogallery

Find us on Facebook | Join IBNLive community

Stay ahead with G-Talk Buddy | Click now!

Ads by Google
  
Print
Email

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked the Centre to explain why it should not stay the decision to implement 27 per cent quota in higher educational institutions for the Other Backward Classes (OBCs).

The Apex Court's notice comes as response to a petition filed by the NGO, Youth for Equality, challenging the January 7, 2007 notification of the Centre as being unconstitutional and violative of the fundamental rights of other citizens.

The reservation issue has dominated Indian politics for the past one year. It was in 2005 that the Government amended the Constitution to make way for reservation.

The enabling legislation called Central Universities Act 2007 was passed in the recent Winter Session of Parliament.

The Supreme Court notice is of significance, in the light of its recent observation that all Parliamentary legislations can be reviewed.

However, the notice could also mean that the judiciary and the legislature are headed for another clash.

In 2005, there was a 93rd amendment made to the Constitution that made it possible for the legislature to allow 27 per cent quota in private institutions that were aided by the Government.

Parliamentarians are now saying that the notice shows the basic view of the judiciary against the quota policy.

Nonetheless, what is important is that this is simply a notice - the first step in the proceedings of the judiciary.

Also, the case is being heard by a Division Bench and so this is not a hearing on the amendment, for which a larger Constitutional Bench would be required.

Ads by Google
Related Ads:

About Us | Disclaimer | Careers @ IBN | RSS | Podcast | Contact Us | Feedback | Advertise With Us | Connect.in.com

© 2010 IBNLive.com India. All Rights Reserved. A Web18 Venture

CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them.