IBNLive.com: Breaking news from India

 

Font Size A+A-

Anti-quota groups cheer order

TimePublished on Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:02, Updated on Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 08:29 in India section

HERE TO STAY: Youth for Equality that spearheaded the anti-quota stir, welcomed the SC ruling.

HERE TO STAY: Youth for Equality that spearheaded the anti-quota stir, welcomed the SC ruling.


ibnlive.com is on mobile now. Read news, watch videos
be a Citizen Journalist. Log on to m.ibnlive.com NOW!

Photogallery

Find us on Facebook | Join IBNLive community

Stay ahead with G-Talk Buddy | Click now!

Ads by Google

New Delhi: The Supreme Court’s decision calling for the stay of 27 per cent reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in elite educational institutions, including IIMs and IITs on Thursday was received was welcomed with open arms by the anti-quota student community.

“It is an amazing judgement and rationality has prevailed. The more you recongnise caste, the more is the discrimination,” says member of the United Students Forum, Dhruv Suri.

Suri, who along with other students and organisations had challenged the Centre's plan to implement the quota, added, “The more you recognise caste, there’s more discrimination.”

The ruling of the SC was pronounced on a bunch of petitions challenging the Government notification to implement the controversial Central Educational Institution (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006.

Aditya Raj Kaul of the United Students Front welcomed the verdict “wholeheartedly”.

“We had lost hope in the system, but now the judiciary’s positive judgement has restored our faith,” Kaul said.

He pointed out that in April 2006, when reservation was announced, students were polarised, but says Thursday’s judgement would bring the student community together.

"This is obviously vote-bank politics. I still don’t understand why the government decided to take up the issue like this,” Kaul said.

But pro-quota activist, Udit Raj took the SC stay with a pinch of salt.

"SC does not have any right to meddle with this issue. The judgement is flawed because, the NSS data puts SC/ST figures at 32 per cent and the 1931 census figures puts the figures at 40 per cent the reservations we are asking for is only for 27 per cent. Therefore, the reservations must be put into place," he says.

The Bench of Justices Arijit and Pasayat and L S Panta, who delivered the ruling, stated that Section 6 of the Constitution was not applicable since no data on OBCs has been collected in the last 76 years.

The Bench, reprimanding the Centre, also said that the Centre should stay away from dividing the society on caste basis and should behave in a more responsible way.

Other Reactions

“Today’s judgement is the result of all those people who have been fighting. I congratulate all of them.” - Vice President, Resident Doctor Association Maulana Azad Medical College (MAMC), Manish Nithani.

”We have been expecting this stay order. I am glad the court has taken it as the decision could have affected the country’s social equality. The quota decision was a Central Government decision.” - Dr Rabindranath of the Doctors' Association For Social Equality.

"It is a victory of the people and a victory for the common man against politicians, who had tried to divide the society on the basis of caste.” - President of AIIMS Residents Doctors Association, Kumar Harsh.

Ads by Google
Related Ads:

Copyright © IBNLive.com. All rights reserved. Reproduction of news articles, photos, videos or any other content in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of IBNLive.com is prohibited.

Every time I make a trip to the loo in office, there's always someone who wants to tell me how much weight I've lost

Follow Megha Mamgain as she burns the extra kilos on CNN-IBN, Sat: 12:30 pm,
6:30 pm
and Sun: 2:30 pm

About Us | Disclaimer | Careers @ IBN | RSS | Podcast | Contact Us | Feedback | Advertise With Us | Connect.in.com

© 2009 IBNLive.com India. All Rights Reserved. A Web18 Venture

CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them.

Site powered by URBANEYE