ibnlive » India

Apr 01, 2013 at 10:30pm IST

Suspend sentences of Sanjay Dutt, Zaibunnisa: Katju

New Delhi: Press Council of India chief Markandey Katju, spearheading efforts to seek pardon for 1993 Mumbai blast convicts Sanjay Dutt and Zaibunnisa Kazi, has sought suspension of their jail sentences as long as his appeal is pending before the President. In an appeal sent to the President, the Prime Minister and the Home Minister, Justice Katju has sought that Dutt and Kazi should not be jailed till his appeal for grant of pardon is pending.

"Now, I issue this fresh appeal to you to grant respite/reprieve/suspension of sentence so that they may not have to go to jail during pendency of my appeals for pardon. Mr Majeed Memon, Advocate and Mr Mahesh Bhat, Film producer, join me in both these appeals," Katju wrote.

Katju quoted Article 72 of the constitution to support his point. "In this connection, I refer to the relevant part of Article 72 (1) of the Constitution which states: The President shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence," Katju said.

Suspend sentences of Sanjay Dutt, Zaibunnisa: Katju

In an appeal sent to the President and the PM, Justice Katju has sought that Dutt and Kazi shouldn't be jailed till his appeal for grant of pardon is pending.

He said a perusal of Article 72 (1) shows that pending the grant of pardon respite, reprieve or suspension of the sentence can be granted by the President of India. Katju, a former Supreme Court judge, said the word 'respite' was defined in the Oxford Dictionary as a short delay permitted before an unpleasant obligation is met or a punishment carried out.

He said the word 'respite' is also defined in the same dictionary as 'postponing a sentence or obligation' and added that 'reprieve' has been defined in the same dictionary as 'cancel or postpone the punishment'. "The words reprieve, respite and suspension, which have been used in Article 72, cannot be treated as redundant or otiose. Hence, it is evident that Your Excellency has power to postpone the implementation of the judgement of the Supreme Court," Katju wrote in his appeal.

  • 0
  • 5
  • 3

Latest