Taxman hopes to score in IPL, sends notice to BCCI
Published on Fri, May 16, 2008 at 16:40, Updated on Fri, May 16, 2008 at 16:57 in Business section
Tags: IPL, Income Tax , New Delhi

![]() |


Related Stories
Budget to focus on social sectors, growth 
Education reform will be for all Indians: Sibal 
Federer wins record-breaking 15th Grand Slam title | Photogallery
Bandra-Worli Sea link starts toll tax
One-upmanship: Sonia, Pawar in foodgrain politics 
5 feared dead in Madhya Pradesh factory explosions
Policemen guard Maya's statue wealth across UP 
Youth shot dead by cops had 26 injury marks | Watch 
CPI-M leaders to act to curb Kerala infighting
Paes-Black lose Wimbledon mixed doubles final
New Delhi: The big bucks involved in IPL could now spell trouble for the BCCI. The income tax department has sent a notice to BCCI asking for copies of agreements signed between the IPL franchisees and the foreign players.
The I-T department is investigating whether tax was deducted at source at the rate of 11.3 per cent when payment was made to the foreign players.
IPL is of a continuous nature and not a short-term contract and that the income is being generated on Indian soil, foreign players will have to file returns and pay income tax according to the applicable tax slab.
Meanwhile, the BCCI is expected to oppose this move on grounds that IPL is a short-term assignment and will only attract TDS deductions. BCCI has said that they have replied to the income tax department's notice.
Talking about the tax return tax expert Subhash Lakhotia said, “The foreign players are bound to pay tax since they are playing in India. Tax deduction as sources is mandatory for them. ”
Under the franchise model, a sponsor owning a team pays a stipulated fee to the BCCI to get ownership.
The franchisees have to pay 10 per cent of the bid amount every year to BCCI, as a franchisee fee. With the auction fetching BCCI $723.59 million, BCCI will get $72.36 million each year.
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |















Read Comment | Post Comment
Read more comment »