FACE THE NATION | KARNATAKA ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS
Font Size 
The Karnataka verdict: A vote for stability?
Published on Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:04, Updated on Mon, May 26, 2008 at 16:09 in India section
Tags: Assembly Elections 2008, Karnataka
Related Stories
Photogallery
 |  |
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Sunday created history by getting a foothold in South India. When the final results of Karnataka Assembly elections came out, the BJP had 110 seats under its belt with Congress taking the second spot with 80 seats and Janata Dal (Secular) a distant third with just 28 seats.
For a party that was primarily seen having its base in North and Western India, it's now time to be truly called a national party. In Karnataka, too, the BJP expanded its base from being a Lingayat party to include the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and in the process, reaped rich electoral dividends.
In the SC/ST reserved constituencies, seats BJP won 33 seats compared to 13 last time with the Congress which won 37 seats in 2004 left with 34. The JD(S) was down to just eight from 26 with other getting four compared to three seats last time. As BJP leader B S Yeddyurappa gets ready to become the next chief minister of the state, CNN-IBN’s Face the Nation debated the issue: Is the Karnataka verdict a vote for stability?
The panelists included eminent historian and Bangalore resident Ramachandra Guha, Lankesh Patrike Editor and another Bangalore resident Gauri Lankesh, Member of Parliament and Editor-in-Chief Pioneer Chandan Mitra, Editor-in-Chief of Outlook Vinod Mehta and Congress spokesperson Manish Tiwari. Sagarika Ghose moderated the debate.
The first question asked was: Will the BJP be able to provide good governance?
Ramachandra Guha started the ball rolling by pointing that the BJP not having a single Muslim candidate in the elections was a cause of worry.
“That worry is always there when the BJP is in power. Out of the 224 constituencies not a single Muslim was put by the BJP. On the other hand they minimised what for them has been a very major campaign, which is to convert a multi-faith shrine in Baba Budangiri Hills into a Hindu shrine. Also soon after they won, they announced that they are going to announce special programmes for SCs, STs and minorities. So they are speaking with two voices. On one hand they recognise that in a plural heterogeneous society hardline Hindutva will not be appreciated. On the other hand the RSS hardcore might want the hardline Hindutva. So I think there is an element of confusion in the BJP. One hopes that the confusion will resolve itself in favour of more plural, democratic politics,” Guha said.
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |
Read Comment | Post Comment
The vote for 2008 is not 'Vote for Stability' but it is a "Vote For Division". Now Kannadigas will have
Read Comment
Congress has only one issue against BJP that it is a communal party. common man, atleast wake up now and
Read Comment
The BJP has to perform month after month in Karnataka for people to see and to make a significant impact
Read Comment
What people like Gauri Lankesh and to a lesser extent, Ramachandra Guha, have to realize that in a democracy, the
Read Comment
The stable headed people, with a stable bent of mind, has stably come forward, to vote for a stable party,
Read Comment
Read more comment »