IBNLive.com: Breaking news from India

 

FACE THE NATION

Font Size A+A-

Tibet a lost cause as India treads middle path

TimePublished on Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 03:18, Updated on Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:55 in World section

TIBET'S TICKET TO FREEDOM? Experts debate on whether it would suit Tibet to be a part of China.

TIBET


        
Chinese checkers: Tibet, a victim of diplomacy?

ibnlive.com is on mobile now. Read news, watch videos
be a Citizen Journalist. Log on to m.ibnlive.com NOW!

Related Stories

    Photogallery

    Find us on Facebook | Join IBNLive community

    Stay ahead with G-Talk Buddy | Click now!

    Ads by Google

    The world is watching. That's how the international reaction to the simmering protests in Tibet can be best described. The uproar has reared its head in neighbouring regions and international capitals like New Delhi, Kathmandu, Berlin and even Toronto.

    Meanwhile, China on Monday moved in troops and tanks into Lhasa. The Chinese government also cracked down on YouTube over the weekend as a method of repressing media coverage of the protests.

    Despite the outrage, most countries are cautious about China's role. The Government of India, too, says it is distressed by violence but shies away from any statement about China's violation of human rights in Tibet.

    And that brings us to the question of the day that was asked on CNN-IBN show Face the Nation: Does India feel Tibet is no longer a cause worth fighting for?

    On the panel of experts to debate the issue were former president of the Samta Party and sympathizer of the Free Tibet Movement Jaya Jaitly, member of Free Tibet Movement Dawa Lokyitsang and Congress Spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.

    Taming Tibet

    China's surrender deadline to pro-independence protestors in Tibet has ended. So far 13 are officially dead. In India, young Tibetans staged protests in Bangalore, Delhi and Dharamsala.

    How is it that the Congress-led Government, which is so vociferous about religious freedom in states like Gujarat is silent about religious minorities in Tibet?

    “If you start comparing Tibet with Gujarat then you are forgetting all notions of sovereignty.” Singhvi said and then added, “The Congress party has specifically reiterated its stand that it’s a matter of great concern. We have conveyed all the right words. Beyond that it’s a foreign country with its own sovereignty. By a dignified position in terms of international diplomacy we will deal with the issue.”

    Many believe that since China is an economic behemoth that needs to do business with India, so the country should not spoil its relations with China with regard to Tibet.

    Reacting to this argument Jaitly said, “We should not forget the Tiananmen Square episode. The whole world had stood up for it then and it made a difference to human rights and to China.”

    “Human rights is something that should not block itself with boundaries. I am shocked that the Congress party thinks that a few diplomatic words are enough. We are in a way preventing the Tibetans from protesting in India. I wonder if Abhishek knows that a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in the early 90s had said that any refugee in India has exactly the same rights as the citizen of India except the right to vote,” she added.

    1 | 2 | 3 | Next Page »
    Ads by Google
    Related Ads:

    Maybe my sweat glands have got used to being so lazy that they refuse to do what they're meant to do...make sweat!

    Follow Megha Mamgain as she burns the extra kilos on CNN-IBN, Sat: 12:30 pm,
    6:30 pm
    and Sun: 2:30 pm

    IBNpolitics.com: India's most comprehensive website on General Elections 2009 news, view, analysis, statistics on the national elections.

    About Us | Disclaimer | Careers @ IBN | RSS | Podcast | Contact Us | Feedback | Advertise With Us | Connect.in.com

    © 2009 IBNLive.com India. All Rights Reserved. A Web18 Venture

    CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them.

    Site powered by URBANEYE