Unanswered questions about Benazir's killing
Published on Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 15:44, Updated on Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 16:31 in World section
Tags: Benazir Bhutto, Assassination , New Delhi
![]() |


Related Stories
Federer wins record 15th Grand Slam title
Pranab has promises to keep in Budget of hope 
Budget: How policies impact your life | Secrecy Cordon around the Budget
5 feared dead in Madhya Pradesh factory explosions
Youth shot dead by cops had 26 injury marks 
Varun fears threat to life; Maneka slams Govt
CPI-M Central Committee to act to curb Kerala infights
Recruiter of child suicide bombers held in Afghan
Kargil victory was certain: ex-army chief | Pay Tribute 
Scrap EVMs, let's go back to ballot, says Advani 
New Delhi: The Pakistan government's revelations that there were no bullet marks on Benazir Bhutto's body has thrown up several questions.
On Thursday, the Pakistan government had suggested that Benazir was hit by five bullets in the head and the neck but on Friday the government made a startling revelation that there were no bullet marks on her body.
So the first big question is how did the bullet theory start?
Bhutto's body was handed over to her family within hours of the assassination, and the revelations come after her burial. Doctors of the Rawalpindi General Hospital where Benazir was taken after getting injured say there was no autopsy conducted. But just why was there no post mortem?
On the basis of X-ray reports the Pakistan Foreign Ministry has suggested that a skull fracture caused by a shrapnel injury led to Benazir's death.
But how was this established without an autopsy and considering the manner in which Benazir was killed, was there any need for taking formal permission for a post mortem?
The fact that the doubts are being raised after Benazir's burial only suggests further that there could be more to the assassination than what meets the eye.
The following questions remain answered:
- Question: The missing bullets?
Question: No autopsy.
Friday: Body handed over to family within hours.
Saturday: Doubts raised post her burial. So why was there no post-mortem?
Question: Died of skull fracture?
Friday: Bullet injuries caused death.
Saturday: Theory of skull fracture or shrapnel injury introduced and how how was this established without autopsy ?
Question: Permission needed?
Friday: Was formal investigation launched?
Saturday: Doctors medical report released. Is formal permission for autopsy needed?
Friday: Reports claimed she had been hit by five bullets in the neck and chest
Saturday: There are no bullet marks on her body. So how did the bullet theory start?
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |
















Read Comment | Post Comment
Pak govt is unbelivable.First it failed to provide security and now it is trying to cover the truth.It is suspicious.Being
Read Comment
Read more comment »