We believe in being Indian: KNO
Published on Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 21:02, Updated on Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 12:21 in India section
Tags: Seilen Haokip, V K Shashikumar
![]() |


I took calculated risks for higher growth: Pranab 
Udayan's View: Budget 2009, a game of patience
A study in comparison: Education budget up Rs 7K cr
Face The Budget: Political response to Budget 09-10 
The verdict: CNN-IBN panelists rate Pranab's Budget 
Reform hopes dashed, market watchers feel let down
I-T exemption limit raised | FBT rolled back | Taxes and you
Pranab skips two paras of Budget speech, apologises
Bengal benefits, Mamata and Pranab budget for their state
Income tax limits raised; farmers, exporters get sops
In an exclusive interview, spokesperson for Kuki National Organsation, Seilen Haokip, talks to V K Shashikumar, Special Investigations, CNN-IBN about Naga and Kuki issues.
V K Shashikumar: There are competing histories. The Nagas have a different historical outlook on the Kuki issue, the Kukis have a different outlook on Naga issues, and so on and so forth and it seems to be spread over all ethnicities in the Northeast. At some point in time the competing histories will have to cooperate. How do you arrive at that position?
Seilen Haokip: I agree with you there are competing histories, and in a sense that is inevitable because both communities rely on the oral traditions and its difficult in that context to say that this is right and that is wrong. However what has been problematic is our histories in the recorded sense were started by the British.
There is no other recorded history that is accessible to both communities at the moment. It is from the perspective of the colonialist. What is written by the British is not complementary toward the Kukis as much as they are towards the Nagas.
V K Shashikumar: Effort is being made by the Kukis themselves, to present their own history in their own way. Books are being written and so on.
Seilen Haokip: True. But we are relying on sources, again which are lying largely based on oral traditions. And if you pit that against what the British have written, it’s a bit difficult to balance the two. One specific reason for that is, for the time that the British moved to the Northeast, the Kukis sort of opposed them, they didn’t want them to come into their lands.
And they record this in their books as Kuki raids, I mean that’s their perspective, from our perspective it’s defending our territory, our area of influence, etc. Naga nationalism, no offense meant, was promoted by the British.
V K Shashikumar: All of this, including your views on Naga nationalism is colored by or in the context of the Kuki-Naga clashes. Isn’t that kind of a reality, fact of life that those clashes fundamentally altered the way that Kukis looks at Nagas and visa-versa?
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |















Read Comment | Post Comment
Hi Mr. Holmes, there is a clear evident and the plight of these ethnic community in Manipur can be met
Read Comment
we the kukis believe in peaceful resolution to our demands.if the government thinks its above our status to involves us
Read Comment
If Kuki loyalty begets Government's apathy and neglect, there should be a change of stance. The Kukis owe it to
Read Comment
The Government of India is fully aware of the Kuki issue. However, because the Kuki want to resolve their issues
Read Comment
NSCN-IM committed the Kuki genocide. 900 souls perished, 350 villages were wiped out and more than 50,000 people were rendered
Read Comment
Read more comment »