Font Size 
Why CNN-IBN did not telecast trust vote sting
Published on Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:33, Updated on Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 13:38 in India section
Tags: Parliament, Trust Vote
 |
Related Stories
HC bars security forces from leaving Shopian - Dehradun cops accused of killing man to win medals
- CPI-M may decide feuding Kerala leaders' fate
- CM helpless, admits Maoists extort Rs 300 cr annually
- Bandh call by Hindu outfit gets mixed response in Mysore
- Time for Mamata to walk the Budget talk
- Mamata's Budget Express | Mamata Exclusive | Rail Budget
- Top bosses fly high as AI struggles to survive
- 10 years of Kargil, heroes recall the war | Pay Tribute
- Cabinet split over order legalising homosexuality
Photogallery
 |  |
In the last week, there has been speculation over an alleged ‘sting’ operation conducted by CNN-IBN to expose allegations of bribery in the run-up to the trust vote in Parliament.
Since the speculation is based on hearsay, conjecture and mere guess-work, we at CNN-IBN, the country's leading English news channel, feel that it is necessary to set the record straight. As a journalist-driven organisation, we value our credibility and independence above all else.
We have always striven to raise the bar of journalism, to ensure that the highest standards and procedures are followed at all times.
The 'sting' operation conducted by our investigation team was part of this commitment to ensure that the public interest is enhanced. Our team had begun the investigations at least a week before the trust vote and the 'sting' was to be part of a wide-ranging investigation across the political spectrum into allegations of horse trading.
Moreover, the 'sting' operation we conducted was unique in that neither were we participants, nor were we engaging in 'entrapment' by offering cash, nor were we under a false identity.
We were, as is accepted in practices in the international press, 'flies on the wall', simply recording an alleged bribery operation, without interfering in it at any stage.
Why have we not telecast the story so far? Quite simply, we have chosen not to telecast the story yet because we did not feel that the story was complete.
Credible journalism is based on accuracy not speed, facts not sensationalism, reportage not allegations and assumptions. Our rigorous editorial protocol demands that even a hidden camera shoot is absolutely water-tight.
In this particular story, there were many loose ends that needed to be cross-checked, corroborated and investigated further before the story could be aired.
As it transpired, even before we could complete the process of investigation, three BJP MPs made allegations in parliament of having been bribed and displayed cash in the House.
In the politically surcharged circumstances, we felt that the more appropriate step would be to provide the recordings we had made till date to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha as the appropriate constitutional authority.
All the raw, unedited footage was placed before the Speaker within 24 hours of Parliament fracas. Not a single frame has been edited in any form.
[ Single Page View ]
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |
URBANEYE
Read Comment | Post Comment
While I appreicate the fact that CNN-IBn has tried to explain itself, I think it must also leave it to
Read Comment
Point taken. I did not except CNN IBN to create sensation for the sake of creating one and the decision
Read Comment
My earlier comment is not shown. I feel the reason may be because I was too open. Anyway, there is
Read Comment
Fine. Its your call to not to broadcast. But at the same time you have to think that you can
Read Comment
We salute your maturity. But still a long way to go to prove your impartiality and courage. You said you
Read Comment
Read more comment »