IBNLive.com: Breaking news from India

 

VIOLATING SC GUIDELINES

Font Size A+A-

Woman denied child custody for being HIV+

TimePublished on Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:55, Updated on Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 13:02 in India section

POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION: The court denied the victim her child's custody and also made her identity public.

POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION: The court denied the victim her child


ibnlive.com is on mobile now. Read news, watch videos
be a Citizen Journalist. Log on to m.ibnlive.com NOW!

Related Stories

    Photogallery

    Find us on Facebook | Join IBNLive community

    Stay ahead with G-Talk Buddy | Click now!

    Ads by Google

    Jaipur: It's just a photograph of her nine-year-old daughter that a Jaipur-based HIV positive woman has seen for almost two years now. Infected by her husband, who died in 2003, she was forcibly separated from the child by her in-laws in 2005.

    However, the real blow for her came a week ago when a trial court in Jaipur denied her the child's custody on the grounds that she is HIV positive and hence cannot look after the child.

    "They say I can't look after her. When her grandparents, who are in their 70s can look after her, then why can't I? And I have already said that as long as I am alive, my child should be with me and then with whoever she wishes to stay with," says the woman.

    Adds Secretary People's Union for Civil Liberties Jaipur, Kavita Shrivastava, "What they have ended up doing is violating her mother's natural guardian right, which the Supreme Court has over and over again held for women. The court has denied her this right and that too on a discriminatory ground that she's HIV positive."

    And as if losing her child wasn't enough, the HIV positive woman also has to contend with what she feels is an insensitive attitude of the court.

    While passing its order, the court had made her identity public.

    Experts say it's a contravention of Article 14 of the Constitution, and of a Supreme Court directive on keeping identities of HIV positive persons confidential.

    Says the victim's lawyer, Ajay Kumar Jain, "The trial court has refused to conceal the identity of the woman though a specific prayer was made by her in this regard."

    Women's groups have now stepped in on the victim's behalf and filed an appeal against the order. They are also demanding compensation for the damages she's incurred because of the trauma.

    Meanwhile, the Additional District and Sessions Judge Court has stayed the trial court's order and the next date of hearing has been set for October 11.

    Ads by Google
    Related Ads:

    Maybe my sweat glands have got used to being so lazy that they refuse to do what they're meant to do...make sweat!

    Follow Megha Mamgain as she burns the extra kilos on CNN-IBN, Sat: 12:30 pm,
    6:30 pm
    and Sun: 2:30 pm

    IBNpolitics.com: India's most comprehensive website on General Elections 2009 news, view, analysis, statistics on the national elections.

    About Us | Disclaimer | Careers @ IBN | RSS | Podcast | Contact Us | Feedback | Advertise With Us | Connect.in.com

    © 2009 IBNLive.com India. All Rights Reserved. A Web18 Venture

    CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of CNN-IBN does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them.

    Site powered by URBANEYE